Volume 6, Issue 4 (3-2021)
J Sport Biomech 2021, 6(4): 240-249 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Department of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
Abstract: (2075 Views)
Objective: The control ability different positions of body in space was due to interaction between neural, sensory, and muscle-skeletal systems, which is generally defined as postural control. Limitations in mobility: The prevalence of balance and gait problems is also high in persons with intellectual disabilities. Thus, the present research aimed to examine the effect of visual, proprioception, and vestibular systems manipulation on postural control in three groups of girls with Intellectual Disability.
Methods: The method of the present study is comparative-causative. The statistical population of this study was all girls with oral disabilities in special schools in Rasht. Sixty girls with Intellectual Disability were assessed in groups of 7-9, 10-12, and 18-16 years old (N=20). Postural control was evaluated in four conditions: open and closed eyes and on hard and soft surfaces. Collected data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc test via SPSS software, V. 21 (P<0.05).
Results: The research findings indicated that there were significant differences in postural control in all of the three groups. Based on the results in conditions 1, 2, and 3, there are significant differences between groups 1 and 3 and 2 and 3.
Conclusion: These results support recent findings suggesting that Sensory systems for children with Intellectual Disabilities up to the age of 16-18 are still growing and maturing in terms of organizing and integrating with other systems in postural control. In each of the three age groups, the central nervous system, based on the proprioception information, provided better postural control.
Methods: The method of the present study is comparative-causative. The statistical population of this study was all girls with oral disabilities in special schools in Rasht. Sixty girls with Intellectual Disability were assessed in groups of 7-9, 10-12, and 18-16 years old (N=20). Postural control was evaluated in four conditions: open and closed eyes and on hard and soft surfaces. Collected data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc test via SPSS software, V. 21 (P<0.05).
Results: The research findings indicated that there were significant differences in postural control in all of the three groups. Based on the results in conditions 1, 2, and 3, there are significant differences between groups 1 and 3 and 2 and 3.
Conclusion: These results support recent findings suggesting that Sensory systems for children with Intellectual Disabilities up to the age of 16-18 are still growing and maturing in terms of organizing and integrating with other systems in postural control. In each of the three age groups, the central nervous system, based on the proprioception information, provided better postural control.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2020/08/5 | Accepted: 2020/11/7 | Published: 2021/03/1
Received: 2020/08/5 | Accepted: 2020/11/7 | Published: 2021/03/1
References
1. Jankowicz-Szymanska A, Mikolajczyk E, Wojtanowski W. The effect of physical training on static balance in young people with intellectual disability. Research in developmental disabilities. 2012 Apr 30;33(2):675-81. [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.11.015] [PMID]
2. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organization; 2001.
3. Shams A, Aslankhani MA, Abdoli B, Ashayeri H, Namazi Zadeh M. The effect of visual, proprioception and vestibular systems manipulation on postural control in boys with 4-16 years-old. Journal of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. 2014 Jun 15;16(3):22-32.
4. Peterson ML, Christou E, Rosengren KS. Children achieve adult-like sensory integration during stance at 12-years-old. Gait & posture. 2006 Jun 30;23(4):455-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.05.003] [PMID]
5. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
6. Winter DA, Patla AE, Prince F, Ishac M, Gielo-Perczak K. Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. Journal of neurophysiology. 1998 Sep 1;80(3):1211-21. [DOI:10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1211] [PMID]
7. Steindl R, Kunz K, Schrott-Fischer A, Scholtz AW. Effect of age and sex on maturation of sensory systems and balance control. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2006 Jun;48(6):477-82. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2006.tb01299.x]
8. Fitzpatrick R, McCloskey DI. Proprioceptive, visual and vestibular thresholds for the perception of sway during standing in humans. The Journal of physiology. 1994 Jul 1;478(1):173-86. [DOI:10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020240] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Neuringer M, Jeffrey BG. Visual development: neural basis and new assessment methods. The Journal of pediatrics. 2003 Oct 1;143(4):87-95. [DOI:10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00406-2]
10. Brecelj J. From immature to mature pattern ERG and VEP. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 2003 Nov 1;107(3):215-24. [DOI:10.1023/B:DOOP.0000005330.62543.9c] [PMID]
11. Horak FB, Henry SM, Shumway-Cook A. Postural perturbations: new insights for treatment of balance disorders. Physical therapy. 1997 May 1;77(5):517-33. [DOI:10.1093/ptj/77.5.517] [PMID]
12. Foudriat BA, Di Fabio RP, Anderson JH. Sensory organization of balance responses in children 3-6 years of age: a normative study with diagnostic implications. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 1993 Oct 1;27(3):255-71. [DOI:10.1016/0165-5876(93)90231-Q]
13. Cumberworth VL, Patel NN, Rogers W, Kenyon GS. The maturation of balance in children. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 2007 May;121(5):449-54. [DOI:10.1017/S0022215106004051] [PMID]
14. Godoi D, Barela JA. Body sway and sensory motor coupling adaptation in children: effects of distance manipulation. Developmental Psychobiology. 2008 Jan 1;50(1):77-87. [DOI:10.1002/dev.20272] [PMID]
15. Kirshenbaum N, Riach C, Starkes J. Non-linear development of postural control and strategy use in young children: a longitudinal study. Experimental brain research. 2001 Oct 1;140(4):420-31. [DOI:10.1007/s002210100835] [PMID]
16. Cuisinier R, Olivier I, Vaugoyeau M, Nougier V, Assaiante C. Reweighting of sensory inputs to control quiet standing in children from 7 to 11 and in adults. PLoS One. 2011 May 9;6(5):e19697. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0019697] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Rinaldi NM, Polastri PF, Barela JA. Age-related changes in postural control sensory reweighting. Neuroscience Letters. 2009 Dec 31;467(3):225-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.10.042] [PMID]
18. Hirabayashi SI, Iwasaki Y. Developmental perspective of sensory organization on postural control. Brain and development. 1995 Mar 1;17(2):111-3. [DOI:10.1016/0387-7604(95)00009-Z]
19. Woollacott M, Debû B, Mowatt M. Neuromuscular control of posture in the infant and child: is vision dominant?. Journal of motor behavior. 1987 Jun 1;19(2):167-86. [DOI:10.1080/00222895.1987.10735406] [PMID]
20. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. The growth of stability: postural control from a developmental perspective. Journal of motor behavior. 1985 Jun 1;17(2):131-47. [DOI:10.1080/00222895.1985.10735341] [PMID]
21. Ferber-Viart C, Ionescu E, Morlet T, Froehlich P, Dubreuil C. Balance in healthy individuals assessed with Equitest: maturation and normative data for children and young adults. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2007 Jul 31;71(7):1041-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.03.012] [PMID]
22. Farzaneh Hessari A, Daneshmandi H, Mahdavi S. The effect of 8 weeks of core stabilization training program on balance in hearing impaired students. Journal of Sport Medicine 2011; 3(2): 67-83. [Persian]. [DOI:10.2478/v10036-011-0010-4]
23. Seyedi M, Seidi F, Minoonejad H. An Investigation of the efficiency of sensory systems involved in postural control in deaf athletes and non-athletes. Journal of Sport Medicine 2015; 7(1): 111-27. [In Persian].
24. Parvizi S. Comparison of balance between 6-12 year old deaf boys and their relationship with age [MSc Thesis]. Tehran, Iran: Iran University of Medical Sciences; 2001. p. 3-36. [Persian].
25. Sedaghati P, Zolghare H, Shahbazi M. The effect of proprioceptive, vestibular and visual changes on posture control among the athletes with and without medial tibial stress syndrome. KAUMS Journal (FEYZ). 2019 Apr 10;23(1):68-74.
26. Taheri M, Irandoust K, Norasteh A, Shaviklo J. The Effect of Combined Core Stability and Neuromuscular Training on Postural Control in Students with Congenital Hearing Loss. Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences.2017; 13(2): 80-86. [Persian].
27. Ebrahimi Sani S. Comparison of static equilibrium and the effect of sensory systems on its control in healthy children with developmental coordination disorder [MSc Thesis]. Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran; 2009. [Persian].
28. Mohammadi F. Evaluation of CNS function in the control of the hypersecretory and sensory-system manipulation in Gulbal athletes and comparison with non-athletics blind and sighted. [MSc Thesis]. Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran; 2009. [Persian].
29. Szymczyk D, drużbicki M, dudek, J, szczepanik M, Snela, S.Balance and postural stability in football players with hearing impairment. Balance, 796, 45.332-056.326.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |