Volume 7, Issue 4 (3-2021)                   J Sport Biomech 2021, 7(4): 280-289 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bargahmadi M, Fakhri Mirzanag E, Mahdizadeh S S. Comparison of the Impulse the New BETA Volleyball Designed With Other Volleyballs Samples. J Sport Biomech. 2021; 7 (4) :280-289
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-270-en.html
1- Department of Sport Management and Biomechanics, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
2- CEO of Tanin Peak Sabalan (BETA Sport Balls), Ardabil, Iran
Abstract:   (955 Views)
Background and aim The sport of volleyball requires constant contact of sports balls with the hands of athletes, Therefore, the sports balls used in volleyball can play an important role in the performance of athletes. therefore, the aim of the present study is to compare the impulse of the new BETA volleyball designed with other samples volleyballs using the Bertak model force plate made in the United States. Material and Methods Examples of Mikasa volleyballs, model V200W, made in Japan, Fox volleyball, model Spain, made in France and Old and new BETA volleyballs made in Iran with a weight range of 260 to 270 grams with a circumference of 66 cm were used in the present study, Finally, the impulses of volleyballs were compared using a Bertek model force plate machine. Results In line with the findings of the present study, there is a significant difference between the impulse of the sample of the new BETA volleyball ball designed at compared to the volleyball sample of the old beta design in the direction of the vertical axis (P = 0.014). in this regard, the post hoc test showed that there is no statistically significant difference between the sample of the new BETA volleyball at compared to the sample of Fox volleyball (P = 0.102) and Mikasa volleyball that is used in official competitions (P = 0.662). Conclusion Therefore, the use of a new BETA volleyball designed to reduce the rate of sports injuries is recommended to all coaches, referees, athletes and officials in the field of volleyball.
Full-Text [PDF 4758 kb]   (101 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (103 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/09/21 | Accepted: 2021/12/19 | Published: 2022/03/1

1. Chiu LZ. Analysis of different volleyballs' collision mechanics across a range of incident velocities. Sports biomechanics. 2018. [DOI:10.1080/14763141.2018.1535618] [PMID]
2. Tsui F, Pain MT. Muscle tension increases impact force but decreases energy absorption and pain during visco-elastic impacts to human thighs. Journal of biomechanics. 2018;67:123-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.11.032] [PMID]
3. Koizumi A, Hong S, Sakamoto K, Sasaki R, Asai T. A study of impact force on modern soccer balls. Procedia Engineering. 2014;72:423-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.06.074]
4. Bjelica D, Gardašević J. Volleyball elastic properties depending on ball pressure. Sport Science. 2018;11(1):45-51.
5. Bahr R, Reeser JC. Injuries among world-class professional beach volleyball players: the Federation Internationale de Volleyball beach volleyball injury study. The American journal of sports medicine. 2003;31(1):119-25. [DOI:10.1177/03635465030310010401] [PMID]
6. Baugh CM, Weintraub GS, Gregory AJ, Djoko A, Dompier TP, Kerr ZY. Descriptive epidemiology of injuries sustained in National Collegiate Athletic Association men's and women's volleyball, 2013-2014 to 2014-2015. Sports health. 2018;10(1):60-9. [DOI:10.1177/1941738117733685] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Clark JM, Post A, Hoshizaki TB, Gilchrist MD. Protective capacity of ice hockey helmets against different impact events. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2016;44(12):3693-704. [DOI:10.1007/s10439-016-1686-3] [PMID]
8. Tierney GJ, Power J, Simms C. Force experienced by the head during heading is influenced more by speed than the mechanical properties of the football. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2021;31(1):124-31. [DOI:10.1111/sms.13816] [PMID]
9. Papageorgiou A, Spitzley W. Handbook for competitive volleyball: Meyer & Meyer Verlag; 2003.
10. Club FY. Members' Handbook: Frankston Yacht Club; 2009.
11. Thomas HJ. A parametric analysis of the aerodynamic characteristics of volleyballs in turbulent flow: University of Washington; 2012.
12. Munro CF, Miller DI, Fuglevand AJ. Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination. Journal of biomechanics. 1987;20(2):147-55. [DOI:10.1016/0021-9290(87)90306-X]
13. Robertson G, Caldwell G, Hamill J, Kamen G, Whittlesey S. Research methods in biomechanics, 2E: Human Kinetics; 2013. [DOI:10.5040/9781492595809]
14. Cross R. Ball Bounce and Spin. Physics of Baseball & Softball: Springer; 2011. p. 261-77. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-8113-4_16]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Sport Biomechanics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb