Volume 10, Issue 3 (11-2024)                   J Sport Biomech 2024, 10(3): 242-252 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hajilou B, Azadian E, Sadeghi S, Mohammadi Sasan R. Evaluation of the Effect of Five-Finger Shoes on Calf Muscle Electromyography Activity in Novice Runners. J Sport Biomech 2024; 10 (3) :242-252
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-351-en.html
1- Department of Sensorimotor Disabilities, Research Institute of Exceptional Children, Research Institute for Education, Organization for Educational Research and Planning, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Motor Behavior, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.
3- Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.
4- Department of Sport Injury and Corrective Exercise, Faculty of Humanities, University College of Omran_Toseeh, Hamedan, Iran.
Abstract:   (654 Views)
Objective The foot is the most distal part of the moving human body and serves as the sole point of contact with the ground, transmitting significant forces from the ground to the foot. One of the tools used to modulate these forces during running is appropriate footwear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of five-finger shoes on the electromyographic activity of calf muscles in novice male runners while running.
Methods In this semi-experimental study, 16 novice runners volunteered to participate. The activity of the anterior tibialis, soleus, and medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles during the absorption and propulsion phases of running in two conditions—barefoot and using Vibram five-finger shoes—was recorded using an electromyography device. A paired t-test was used for data analysis, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.
Results When running with five-finger shoes, the electromyography activity of the anterior tibialis muscle during the absorption phase (p = 0.001) and the soleus (p = 0.002) and medial gastrocnemius (p = 0.010) muscles during the propulsion phase was significantly higher compared to running barefoot. However, the activity of the lateral gastrocnemius muscle did not show a significant difference compared to the barefoot condition (p > 0.05).
Conclusion The use of five-finger shoes can be considered a reliable footwear option for sports activities, including running, as the muscle activity during their use is very similar to that during barefoot running.
Full-Text [PDF 1663 kb]   (207 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (285 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/11/14 | Accepted: 2025/01/5 | Published: 2025/01/7

References
1. Kelly LA, Lichtwark GA, Farris DJ, Cresswell A. Shoes alter the spring-like function of the human foot during running. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2016;13(119):20160174. [DOI:10.1098/rsif.2016.0174] [PMID]
2. Hirschmüller A, Baur H, Müller S, Helwig P, Dickhuth H-H, Mayer F. Clinical effectiveness of customised sport shoe orthoses for overuse injuries in runners: a randomised controlled study. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2011;45(12):959-65. [DOI:10.1136/bjsm.2008.055830] [PMID]
3. García-Arrabé M, García-Fernandez P, Díaz-Arribas MJ, López-Marcos JJ, González-de-la-Flor Á, Estrada-Barranco C, et al. Electromyographic activity of the pelvic floor muscles and internal oblique muscles in women during running with traditional and minimalist shoes: a cross-over clinical trial. Sensors. 2023;23(14):6496. [DOI:10.3390/s23146496] [PMID]
4. Azevedo APdS, Mezêncio B, Amadio AC, Serrao JC. 16 weeks of progressive barefoot running training changes impact force and muscle activation in habitual shod runners. PloS one. 2016;11(12):e0167234. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0167234] [PMID]
5. Gillinov SM, Laux S, Kuivila T, Hass D, Joy SM. Effect of minimalist footwear on running efficiency: A randomized crossover trial. Sports health. 2015;7(3):256-60. [DOI:10.1177/1941738115571093] [PMID]
6. Davis IS, Rice HM, Wearing SC. Why forefoot striking in minimal shoes might positively change the course of running injuries. Journal of sport and health science. 2017;6(2):154-61. [DOI:10.1016/j.jshs.2017.03.013] [PMID]
7. Davis IS. The re-emergence of the minimal running shoe. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2014;44(10):775-84. [DOI:10.2519/jospt.2014.5521] [PMID]
8. Campitelli NA, Spencer SA, Bernhard K, Heard K, Kidon A. Effect of Vibram FiveFingers minimalist shoes on the abductor hallucis muscle. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2016;106(5):344-51. [DOI:10.7547/14-084] [PMID]
9. Hoseini SZ, Eslami M. Effect of Five-Finger Shoes on Vertical Ground Reaction Force Loading Rates and Perceived Comfort during the Stance Phase of the Running. Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2016;2(1):37-47.
10. Hannigan J, Pollard CD. Differences in running biomechanics between a maximal, traditional, and minimal running shoe. Journal of science and medicine in sport. 2020;23(1):15-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2019.08.008] [PMID]
11. Becker J, Borgia B. Kinematics and muscle activity when running in partial minimalist, traditional, and maximalist shoes. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2020;50:102379. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102379] [PMID]
12. Burden S, Maulder P. A biomechanical comparison of the foot strike between running in Vibram Fivefingers® shoes and barefoot/Leah Hutching: Wintec, Hamilton, New Zealand; 2013.
13. Smith BS, Burton B, Johnson D, Kendrick S, Meyer E, Yuan W. Effects of wearing athletic shoes, five‐toed shoes, and standing barefoot on balance performance in young adults. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2015;10(1):69.
14. Sinclair J, Hobbs S, Currigan G, Taylor P. A comparison of several barefoot inspired footwear models in relation to barefoot and conventional running footwear. Comparative Exercise Physiology. 2013;9(1):13-21. [DOI:10.3920/CEP13004]
15. Hajiloo B, Anbarian M, Esmaeili H, Mirzapour M. The effects of fatigue on synergy of selected lower limb muscles during running. Journal of Biomechanics. 2020;103:109692. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109692] [PMID]
16. Sepehrian M, Anbarian M, Khotanlou H, Hajilou B. Effects of Cycling-induced Fatigue on Lower Extremity Muscles Synergy in Novice Triathletes. Journal of Advanced Sport Technology. 2022;6(1):103-12.
17. Stegeman D, Hermens H. Standards for surface electromyography: The European project Surface EMG for non-invasive assessment of muscles (SENIAM). Enschede: Roessingh Research and Development. 2007;10:8-12.
18. Schorderet C, Hilfiker R, Allet L. The role of the dominant leg while assessing balance performance. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait & posture. 2021;84:66-78. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.11.008] [PMID]
19. Alvim F, Cerqueira L, Netto ADA, Leite G, Muniz A. Comparison of five kinematic-based identification methods of foot contact events during treadmill walking and running at different speeds. Journal of applied biomechanics. 2015;31(5):383-8. [DOI:10.1123/jab.2014-0178] [PMID]
20. Winter D. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:1211. [DOI:10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1211] [PMID]
21. Beierle R, Burton P, Smith H, Smith M, Ives SJ. The effect of barefoot running on EMG activity in the gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior in active college-aged females. International journal of exercise science. 2019;12(1):1110. [DOI:10.70252/LNVL7215] [PMID]
22. Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel WA, Daoud AI, D'andrea S, Davis IS, et al. Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature. 2010;463(7280):531-5. [DOI:10.1038/nature08723] [PMID]
23. Divert C, Mornieux G, Freychat P, Baly L, Mayer F, Belli A. Barefoot-shod running differences: shoe or mass effect? International journal of sports medicine. 2008;29(06):512-8. [DOI:10.1055/s-2007-989233] [PMID]
24. Warne JP, Gruber AH. Transitioning to minimal footwear: a systematic review of methods and future clinical recommendations. Sports medicine-open. 2017;3:1-21. [DOI:10.1186/s40798-017-0096-x] [PMID]
25. Squadrone R, Gallozzi C. Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners. Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness. 2009;49(1):6.
26. Hoitz F, Vienneau J, Nigg BM. Influence of running shoes on muscle activity. PloS one. 2020;15(10):e0239852. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0239852] [PMID]
27. Johnson A, Myrer J, Mitchell U, Hunter I, Ridge S. The effects of a transition to minimalist shoe running on intrinsic foot muscle size. International journal of sports medicine. 2016;37(02):154-8. [DOI:10.1055/s-0036-1585483]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Sport Biomechanics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb