Volume 10, Issue 1 (5-2024)                   J Sport Biomech 2024, 10(1): 54-68 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohammad Zaheri R, Majlesi M, Fatahi A. Assessing the Effects of Fatigue on Ground Reaction Force Variations during Landing after a Spike in Professional Volleyball Players. J Sport Biomech 2024; 10 (1) :54-68
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-337-en.html
1- Department of Sports Biomechanics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Sport Biomechanics, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 1891 kb]   (416 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (969 Views)
Full-Text:   (687 Views)
Extended Abstract
1.    Introduction
Volleyball is an Olympic sport played in over 200 countries worldwide. Players use complex movements in both attack and defense, with the spike being one of the most important techniques used to score points (1). The spike requires high skills in jumping and landing. Offensive players aim to achieve a high jump to make their next move unpredictable and to hit the ball with greater speed, which correlates with their level of competition (2). By applying biomechanical principles, coaches and scientists can identify techniques to improve performance, reduce injury risk, and extend athletic careers. This knowledge is especially important in sports involving jumping, like volleyball, where precise body positioning and landing techniques play a significant role in preventing injuries (3, 4). Studies have shown that game-induced fatigue can decrease landing quality and increase the risk of both acute and chronic injuries (5-7). Fatigue negatively impacts athletic performance by reducing neuromuscular precision and motor control, particularly in sports that require high movement accuracy and repeatability (8, 9). Fatigue disrupts the distribution of forces on the body, increases stress on sensitive joints such as the knee and ankle, and reduces muscular resistance to sudden pressures (10, 11). This emphasizes the need for proper training programs and recovery strategies to mitigate fatigue and prevent injuries (12-15). Most studies on landing have assumed that the lower limbs are symmetrical and have only analyzed unilateral data (16-20). However, this study examines the kinetic differences between the dominant and non-dominant legs during landing after a spike and following the onset of fatigue (21-23).
2.    Methods
The This study targeted professional volleyball players aged 18-32 from reputable Iranian leagues. Using G*Power software with α = 0.05 and 80% power (24), 28 male players volunteered, with an average age of 24.56 ± 2.14 years, height of 1.81 ± 0.15 meters, weight of 76.14 ± 9.09 kg, and BMI of 23.71 ± 7.27. None had lower or upper limb injuries in the past year or were on medication in the month before testing. They completed consent forms, and the testing procedures were explained. A 3D motion analysis system (Vicon Peak, Oxford, UK) with six T20 cameras at 200 Hz and markers on the lower limbs was used to capture movements during tasks (25). Synchronized Kistler force plates at 1000 Hz recorded kinetic data, normalized to body weight (26). The volleyball net was set at 2.43 meters in a calibrated lab area. Participants warmed up for 15 minutes, performed five trial spikes, then executed six spikes each before and after a fatigue protocol, landing on force plates. The fatigue protocol, from Bosco (27), involved four 60-second vertical jump sets with 10-second rests, with increasing effort (50%, 70%, and 100%). Fatigue was marked by a 30% drop in maximum jump height. Variables measured included ground reaction forces (vertical, anterior-posterior, medial-lateral) and loading rates (28, 29), normalized to body weight, analyzed using SPSS with a significance level of P < 0.05.
3.    Results
The results of comparing ground reaction forces before and after fatigue showed that the vertical ground reaction force at the moment of impact, the maximum posterior force, and the medial-lateral force at the moment of impact in the dominant leg had significant differences (P < 0.05). Fatigue did not have a significant effect on other variables (Table 1).

4.    Conclusion
This study examines the impact of fatigue on ground reaction forces (GRF) in three main axes during landing from a volleyball spike. The research aims to provide a deeper understanding of how landing kinetics change under fatigue and its effects on the safety and performance of professional volleyball players. Given the importance of kinetic variables and the influence of fatigue, this study offers valuable insights into injury prevention. The results indicate that fatigue leads to a 15% reduction in vertical GRF in the dominant leg during landing (30-32). Previous research suggests that fatigue can increase the risk of lower limb joint injuries by affecting GRFs (33, 34). Although fatigue may cause asymmetric force distribution between dominant and non-dominant legs, this study found equal GRF levels in both legs post-fatigue (35-37). The dominant leg, typically used for precise and powerful movements, may experience more stress and thus higher GRF during landing (38). Conversely, the non-dominant leg, being less conditioned, might be less capable of absorbing GRF under fatigue, leading to imbalance and injury risk. Fatigue can impair effective force absorption, as suggested by previous studies, which might explain the reduced vertical GRF due to a cautious landing strategy to minimize injury risk. Fatigue also significantly affects posterior and medial-lateral forces, with a 13% reduction in maximum posterior force and a 37% increase in medial-lateral force in the dominant leg post-fatigue (39, 40). These forces are crucial for movement control and balance, and excessive medial-lateral loading can be particularly dangerous for knee ligaments like the ACL (41, 42). Studies have noted differences in limbs regarding various anatomical and physiological aspects, which may contribute to increased ACL injury risk in the dominant leg due to these asymmetries and fatigue (43). Consequently, understanding these dynamics is essential for developing effective training and injury prevention strategies (44).

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

There were no ethical considerations to be addressed in this research.
Funding
This research did not receive any grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.
Authors' contributions
All authors contributed equally to preparing the article.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/04/29 | Accepted: 2024/06/1 | Published: 2024/06/3

References
1. Fuchs PX, Menzel H-JK, Guidotti F, Bell J, von Duvillard SP, Wagner H. Spike jump biomechanics in male versus female elite volleyball players. Journal of sports sciences. 2019;37(21):2411-9. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2019.1639437] [PMID]
2. Sattler T, Hadžic V, Derviševic E, Markovic G. Vertical jump performance of professional male and female volleyball players: Effects of playing position and competition level. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2015;29(6):1486-93. [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000781] [PMID]
3. Nilstad A, Petushek E, Mok K-M, Bahr R, Krosshaug T. Kiss goodbye to the 'kissing knees': No association between frontal plane inward knee motion and risk of future non-contact ACL injury in elite female athletes. Sports biomechanics. 2023;22(1):65-79. [DOI:10.1080/14763141.2021.1903541] [PMID]
4. Maly T, Sugimoto D, Izovska J, Zahalka F, Mala L. Effect of muscular strength, asymmetries and fatigue on kicking performance in soccer players. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018;39(04):297-303. [DOI:10.1055/s-0043-123648] [PMID]
5. Ribeiro F, Santos F, Gonçalves P, Oliveira J. Effects of volleyball match-induced fatigue on knee joint position sense. European Journal of Sport Science. 2008;8(6):397-402. [DOI:10.1080/02614360802373060]
6. Farzami A, Sadeghi H, Fattahi A. The effect of fatigue caused by consecutive jump-landing on plantar pressure characteristics during stance phase of walking in adolescent volleyball players with and without sprain ankle injury. Studies in Sport Medicine. 2019;11(25):207-22.
7. Farzami A, Anbarian M. The effects of fatigue on plantar pressure and balance in adolescent volleyball players with and without history of unilateral ankle injury. Science & Sports. 2020;35(1):29-36. [DOI:10.1016/j.scispo.2019.03.011]
8. Zazulak BT, Hewett TE, Reeves NP, Goldberg B, Cholewicki J. The effects of core proprioception on knee injury: a prospective biomechanical-epidemiological study. The American journal of sports medicine. 2007;35(3):368-73. [DOI:10.1177/0363546506297909] [PMID]
9. Bisseling RW, Hof AL. Handling of impact forces in inverse dynamics. Journal of biomechanics. 2006;39(13):2438-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.021] [PMID]
10. Girard O, Mendez-Villanueva A, Bishop D. Repeated-sprint ability-part I: factors contributing to fatigue. Sports medicine. 2011;41:673-94. [DOI:10.2165/11590550-000000000-00000] [PMID]
11. Meeusen R, Duclos M, Foster C, Fry A, Gleeson M, Nieman D, et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: joint consensus statement of the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2013;45(1):186-205. [DOI:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318279a10a] [PMID]
12. Gandevia SC. Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiological reviews. 2001. [DOI:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.4.1725] [PMID]
13. Enoka RM, Duchateau J. Muscle fatigue: what, why and how it influences muscle function. The Journal of physiology. 2008;586(1):11-23. [DOI:10.1113/jphysiol.2007.139477] [PMID]
14. Enoka RM, Stuart DG. Neurobiology of muscle fatigue. Journal of applied physiology. 1992;72(5):1631-48. [DOI:10.1152/jappl.1992.72.5.1631] [PMID]
15. Hunter SK, Critchlow A, Enoka RM. Muscle endurance is greater for old men compared with strength-matched young men. Journal of applied physiology. 2005;99(3):890-7. [DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00243.2005] [PMID]
16. Mondin D. Athlete Monitoring in Rugby :union:: Inter-and Intra-Week Associations of Objective and Subjective Training Markers with Load During an Entire Rugby :union: Season: Bangor University (United Kingdom); 2021.
17. Meeuwisse WH, Tyreman H, Hagel B, Emery C. A dynamic model of etiology in sport injury: the recursive nature of risk and causation. Clinical journal of sport medicine. 2007;17(3):215-9. [DOI:10.1097/JSM.0b013e3180592a48] [PMID]
18. Soligard T, Schwellnus M, Alonso J-M, Bahr R, Clarsen B, Dijkstra HP, et al. How much is too much?(Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. British journal of sports medicine. 2016;50(17):1030-41. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096583 [DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581]
19. Greig M, Walker-Johnson C. The influence of soccer-specific fatigue on functional stability. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2007;8(4):185-90. [DOI:10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.03.001]
20. Johnston RJ, Watsford ML, Kelly SJ, Pine MJ, Spurrs RW. Validity and interunit reliability of 10 Hz and 15 Hz GPS units for assessing athlete movement demands. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2014;28(6):1649-55. [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000323] [PMID]
21. Sikora O, Lehnert M, Hanzlíková I, Hughes J. The impact of a novel neuromuscular training program on leg stiffness, reactive strength, and landing biomechanics in amateur female rugby players. Applied Sciences. 2023;13(3):1979. [DOI:10.3390/app13031979]
22. Laughlin WA, Weinhandl JT, Kernozek TW, Cobb SC, Keenan KG, O'Connor KM. The effects of single-leg landing technique on ACL loading. Journal of biomechanics. 2011;44(10):1845-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.010] [PMID]
23. Kipp K, McLean SG, Palmieri-Smith RM. Patterns of hip flexion motion predict frontal and transverse plane knee torques during a single-leg land-and-cut maneuver. Clinical biomechanics. 2011;26(5):504-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.01.004] [PMID]
24. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods. 2007;39(2):175-91. [DOI:10.3758/BF03193146] [PMID]
25. Ferrari A, Benedetti MG, Pavan E, Frigo C, Bettinelli D, Rabuffetti M, et al. Quantitative comparison of five current protocols in gait analysis. Gait & posture. 2008;28(2):207-16. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.009] [PMID]
26. Sorkheh E, Majlesi M, Jafarnezhadgero AA. Frequency domain analysis of gait ground reaction forces in deaf and hearing children. Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2018;4(2):17-27.
27. Bosco C, Luhtanen P, Komi PV. A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping. European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology. 1983;50:273-82. [DOI:10.1007/BF00422166] [PMID]
28. Farahpour N, Jafarnezhad A, Damavandi M, Bakhtiari A, Allard P. Gait ground reaction force characteristics of low back pain patients with pronated foot and able-bodied individuals with and without foot pronation. Journal of Biomechanics. 2016;49(9):1705-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.056] [PMID]
29. Munro CF, Miller DI, Fuglevand AJ. Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination. Journal of biomechanics. 1987;20(2):147-55. [DOI:10.1016/0021-9290(87)90306-X] [PMID]
30. James CR, Scheuermann BW, Smith MP. Effects of two neuromuscular fatigue protocols on landing performance. Journal of electromyography and Kinesiology. 2010;20(4):667-75. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.10.007] [PMID]
31. Mizrahi J, Verbitsky O, Isakov E, Daily D. Effect of fatigue on leg kinematics and impact acceleration in long distance running. Human movement science. 2000;19(2):139-51. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-9457(00)00013-0]
32. Cortes N, Onate J, Morrison S. Differential effects of fatigue on movement variability. Gait & posture. 2014;39(3):888-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.11.020] [PMID]
33. Orchard J, Marsden J, Lord S, Garlick D. Preseason hamstring muscle weakness associated with hamstring muscle injury in Australian footballers. The American journal of sports medicine. 1997;25(1):81-5. [DOI:10.1177/036354659702500116] [PMID]
34. Kernozek TW, Torry MR, Iwasaki M. Gender differences in lower extremity landing mechanics caused by neuromuscular fatigue. The American journal of sports medicine. 2008;36(3):554-65. [DOI:10.1177/0363546507308934] [PMID]
35. Fousekis K, Tsepis E, Vagenas G. Lower limb strength in professional soccer players: profile, asymmetry, and training age. Journal of sports science & medicine. 2010;9(3):364.
36. Croisier J-L, Ganteaume S, Binet J, Genty M, Ferret J-M. Strength imbalances and prevention of hamstring injury in professional soccer players: a prospective study. The American journal of sports medicine. 2008;36(8):1469-75. [DOI:10.1177/0363546508316764] [PMID]
37. Impellizzeri FM, Bizzini M, Dvorak J, Pellegrini B, Schena F, Junge A. Physiological and performance responses to the FIFA 11+(part 2): a randomised controlled trial on the training effects. Journal of sports sciences. 2013;31(13):1491-502. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2013.802926] [PMID]
38. Kellis E, Katis A. Biomechanical characteristics and determinants of instep soccer kick. Journal of sports science & medicine. 2007;6(2):154.
39. Devita P, Skelly WA. Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24(1):108-15. [DOI:10.1249/00005768-199201000-00018] [PMID]
40. McLean SG, Huang X, Su A, Van Den Bogert AJ. Sagittal plane biomechanics cannot injure the ACL during sidestep cutting. Clinical biomechanics. 2004;19(8):828-38. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.06.006] [PMID]
41. Mclean SG, Fellin RE, Suedekum N, Calabrese G, Passerallo A, Joy S. Impact of fatigue on gender-based high-risk landing strategies. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2007;39(3):502-14. [DOI:10.1249/mss.0b013e3180d47f0] [PMID]
42. Padua DA, Marshall SW, Boling MC, Thigpen CA, Garrett Jr WE, Beutler AI. The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool of jump-landing biomechanics: the JUMP-ACL study. The American journal of sports medicine. 2009;37(10):1996-2002. [DOI:10.1177/0363546509343200] [PMID]
43. Xia R, Zhang X, Wang X, Sun X, Fu W. Effects of two fatigue protocols on impact forces and lower extremity kinematics during drop landings: implications for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. Journal of healthcare engineering. 2017;2017. [DOI:10.1155/2017/5690519] [PMID]
44. Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Rauh MJ, Myer GD, Huang B, et al. Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. The American journal of sports medicine. 2010;38(10):1968-78. [DOI:10.1177/0363546510376053] [PMID]
45. Zaheri RM, Majlesi M, Azadian E, Fatahi A. Kinematic and kinetic evaluation of jump-landing task in volleyball defense: implications for acl injury risk assessment. Kinesiologia Slovenica. 2022;28(1). [DOI:10.52165/kinsi.28.1.141-155]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Sport Biomechanics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb