Volume 12, Issue 1 (6-2026)                   J Sport Biomech 2026, 12(1): 36-50 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghasemi S, Shahrjerdi S, Kkalantari F. The Effect of Swedish Massage on Ergonomic Risk Factors and Occupational Range of Motion in Hairdressers with Musculoskeletal Disorders. J Sport Biomech 2026; 12 (1) :36-50
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-426-en.html
1- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical and Mechanical Engineering, Hamedan University of Technology, Hamedan, Iran.
2- Department of Sports Physiology and Pathology, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Arak University, Arak, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 2056 kb]   (51 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (199 Views)
Full-Text:   (19 Views)
Extended Abstract
1.    Introduction

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are primarily caused by adopting poor postures, performing repetitive monotonous movements, chronic mechanical loading, and the lack of ergonomic principles in workplace environments (1). The profession of hairdressing, due to the static nature of its activities, repetitive upper limb movements, continuous neck flexion, and chronic pressure on muscles and joints, is considered a high-risk occupation for developing WMSDs. In recent years, massage therapy has attracted researchers' attention as an effective, cost-efficient, and safe method for reducing chronic pain and improving motor function. Among these, Swedish massage has gained a special place in rehabilitation interventions due to its scientific structure, use of standardized techniques, and feasibility of implementation in workplace settings (6). Evidence from recent studies indicates that multidimensional ergonomic interventions—including education, tool modification, and adjustment of work behaviors—are more effective in reducing pain indices and risk factors across various body regions compared to single-dimensional approaches. Despite extensive evidence in the general population, the effectiveness of Swedish massage in specific occupational groups such as hairdressers—especially with a focus on biomechanical and ergonomic indices—remains limited (9,10). Therefore, the present study, using multiple tools and a structured interventional design, investigates the effect of five weeks of Swedish massage on ergonomic indices and motor performance in hairdressers with WMSDs.
2.    Methods
The present study was conducted as a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test–post-test structure for two groups (experimental and control). The statistical population consisted of female hairdressers in Arak city who were suffering from work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Sampling was performed purposefully, and the sample size was determined using G*Power software based on an effect size of 0.80, a significance level of 0.05, and a test power of 0.80 for the independent t-test, resulting in a total of 42 participants (21 in each group) (11). Demographic information of the participants—including age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), work experience, and specialization within the hairdressing profession—was collected using a standardized questionnaire. Inclusion criteria consisted of female hairdressers working in hair services, aged between 25 and 35 years, with no history of limb surgery and free from skin diseases and rheumatic disorders. Exclusion criteria included the occurrence of skin problems or sudden surgery during the study and lack of consent to continue participation. Prior to the implementation phase, all participants were informed about the research process, execution conditions, potential risks, and their ethical rights. After receiving explanations, they signed the informed consent form. This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials with the code IRCT20230619058540N1 and ethical code IR.ARAKU.REC.1402.012. To assess ergonomic risk factors, the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) checklist was used. Musculoskeletal discomfort was evaluated using the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ). Joint range of motion in occupational activities was assessed using a goniometer. The intervention consisted of 10 sessions of Swedish massage over five weeks (two sessions per week). For data analysis, descriptive statistics including mean and standard deviation, and inferential statistics including the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality, Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance, independent t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for between-group comparisons, and paired t-test or Wilcoxon test for within-group comparisons were used. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 25 at a significance level of P≤0.05.
3.    Results
According to the results presented in Table 1, significant between-group differences (p ≤ 0.001) were observed in the range of motion of the neck, trunk, knee, shoulder, forearm, and wrist. Specifically, the range of motion in the experimental group showed a significant reduction compared to the control group. Within-group comparisons also indicated a significant decrease in all motion ranges in the experimental group (p ≤ 0.001). 
4.    Discussion
According to the research objectives, the findings indicated that massage therapy, as a practical, safe, and feasible method in workplace settings, plays a significant role in promoting musculoskeletal health among hairdressers. Ten sessions of Swedish massage led to a statistically significant reduction in ergonomic indices among female hairdressers. This reduction reflects optimized movement patterns, correction of high-tension postures, and decreased mechanical load resulting from repetitive occupational activities (19). These findings are consistent with the results of studies by Kitzing (2015), Bradshaw (2011), and Hassan and Bayomai (2015) (21-23). Massage therapy resulted in reduced occupational range of motion in the neck, shoulder, forearm, wrist, trunk, and knee regions. Contrary to the common assumption of performance decline, this reduction indicates improved joint control, correction of stress-related movement patterns, and enhanced biomechanical coordination in repetitive work tasks. This outcome aligns with studies by Shahrokhi et al. (2020), Khorramizadeh (2020), and Saadatian et al. (2024) (25-27). Additionally, Hernandez et al. (2001) confirmed the effectiveness of massage therapy in reducing chronic low back pain and improving joint range of motion (24). The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders across twenty anatomical regions significantly decreased, indicating improved soft tissue function, reduced trigger points, and increased pain tolerance threshold among participants. These findings are in line with the studies of Hasson et al (2004) and the systematic review by Bervotes et al. (2015), which confirmed the effectiveness of massage in alleviating WMSD symptoms in physically demanding occupations (31,32).
The findings of this study, supported by scientific evidence and comparative research, demonstrated that massage therapy can be utilized as an effective, cost-efficient, and feasible intervention for reducing musculoskeletal disorders, correcting high-risk occupational postures, and promoting occupational health among hairdressers.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

All ethical considerations were fully observed in this study. Participants were informed about the research procedures in detail and provided written consent prior to participation. They were also assured of their right to withdraw from the study at any time without penalty. Furthermore, all personal information was kept strictly confidential and used solely for research purposes.
Funding
This research did not receive any grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors. 
Authors' contributions
All authors participated in the design, implementation, and writing of all parts of this research.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this article. 
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/08/17 | Accepted: 2025/10/22 | Published: 2025/10/23

References
1. Punnett L, Wegman DH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2004;14(1):13-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.015] [PMID]
2. WHOMc. WHO Fact Sheet; Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions2022 (cited 2024 Dec 25).
3. Gilavand A, Mehralizadeh Y, Hosseinpour M, Torabipour A. A Review on Pathology of the Integration of Medical Education System with Health Services at Iran's Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Future of Medical Education Journal. 2018;8(3):47-56.
4. Van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Kuijpers T, Verhagen AP, Ostelo R, Koes BW, et al. A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. European Spine Journal. 2011;20(1):19-39. [DOI:10.1007/s00586-010-1518-3] [PMID]
5. Roshandel Hesari A, Kamali A, Tavakoli M. The Prevalence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome among Male Hairdressers in Bojnourd, Iran. Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2019;5(2):82-91. [DOI:10.32598/biomechanics.5.2.1]
6. Weerapong P, Hume PA, Kolt GS. The mechanisms of massage and effects on performance, muscle recovery and injury prevention. Sports Medicine. 2005;35(3):235-56. [DOI:10.2165/00007256-200535030-00004]
7. Field T. Massage therapy research review. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice. 2014;20(4):224-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2014.07.002] [PMID]
8. Krishnanmoorthy G, Rampal S, Karuthan SR, Baharudin F, Krishna R. Effectiveness of Participatory Ergonomic Interventions on Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders, Sick Absenteeism, and Work Performance Among Nurses: Systematic Review. JMIR Human Factors. 2025;12(1):e68522. [DOI:10.2196/68522] [PMID]
9. Zhang M, Murphy B, Cabanilla A, Yidi C. Physical relaxation for occupational stress in healthcare workers: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Occupational Health. 2021;63(1):1-16. [DOI:10.1002/1348-9585.12243] [PMID]
10. Nazari F, Mirzamohamadi M, Yousefi H. The effect of massage therapy on occupational stress of Intensive Care Unit nurses. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. 2015;20(4):508-15. [DOI:10.4103/1735-9066.161001]
11. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;39(2):175-91. [DOI:10.3758/BF03193146] [PMID]
12. Hignett S, McAtamney L. Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics. 2000;31(2):201-5. [DOI:10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3] [PMID]
13. Schwartz AH, Albin TJ, Gerberich SG. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the rapid entire body assessment (REBA) tool. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2019;71:111-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2019.02.010]
14. Kreuzfeld S, Seibt R, Kumar M, Rieger A, Stoll R. German version of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ): translation and validation. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology. 2016;11(1):13. [DOI:10.1186/s12995-016-0100-2]
15. Afifehzadeh Kashani H HH, Naderi N. . Validation and reliability of the Persian version of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ). Iranian Occupational Health Journal. 2010;7(4):35-42.
16. Lo CN, Yeh T-T, Tan CT, Tsang EW. A reliability and validity study on upper limb range of motion measurement using mobile sensor compared with goniometers. Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine. 2021;3(3):227-33. [DOI:10.53986/ibjm.2021.0036]
17. Holey EA, Cook EM. Evidence-based therapeutic massage: A practical guide for therapists: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.
18. Fritz S, Fritz LA. Mosby's Fundamentals of Therapeutic Massage-E-Book: Mosby's Fundamentals of Therapeutic Massage-E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2024.
19. Mahdavi S, Mahdavi M, Safary M, Rashidi R, Dehghani T, Kosari M. Evaluation of the risk of musculoskeletal disorders using Rapid Entire Body Assessment among hairdressers in Khorramabad, Iran, in 2014. Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology. 2013;2(3):138-45. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.johe.2.3.138]
20. Çakıt E. Ergonomic Risk Assessment of Hairdressers Using Rapid Entire Body Assessment. Ergonomics International Journal. 2022;6(1):1-6. [DOI:10.23880/eoij-16000281]
21. Bradshaw L, Harris-Roberts J, Bowen J, Rahman S, Fishwick D. Self-reported work-related symptoms in hairdressers. Occupational Medicine. 2011;61(5):328-34. [DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqr089] [PMID]
22. Hassan O, Bayomy H. Occupational respiratory and musculoskeletal symptoms among Egyptian female hairdressers. Journal of Oommunity Health. 2015;40(4):670-9. [DOI:10.1007/s10900-014-9983-y] [PMID]
23. Kitzig D, Freitag S, Nienhaus A. Muskel-Skelett-Belastungen bei Beschäftigten im Friseurhandwerk. Zentralblatt für Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz und Ergonomie. 2015;65(1):21-7. [DOI:10.1007/s40664-014-0048-y]
24. Hernandez-Reif M, Field T, Krasnegor J, Theakston H. Lower back pain is reduced and range of motion increased after massage therapy. International Journal of Neuroscience. 2001;106(3-4):131-45. [DOI:10.3109/00207450109149744] [PMID]
25. Khoramizadeh M, Hashem-Dabaghian F, Forogh B, Mohammadi Kenari H. Improvements in quality of life and range of motion in shoulder and neck area after Dalk and Ghamz massage in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2020;29(181):150-5.
26. Saadatian A, Babaei Khorzoghi M, Samadi R. The effect of Yumeiho-therapy massage on therapy massage on pain, proprioception, back and shoulder range of motion in men with trigger points in the back region: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal for Research in Sport Rehabilitation. 2024;11(22):151-61.
27. Shahrokhi H, Abbasi H, Hajian K. The effect of release massage and stretching exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability of the Neck due to Myofascial Trigger Points of the Trapezius Muscle. Studies in Sport Medicine. 2020;12(27):67-82.
28. Kozak A, Wirth T, Verhamme M, Nienhaus A. Musculoskeletal health, work-related risk factors and preventive measures in hairdressing: a scoping review. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology. 2019;14(1):24. [DOI:10.1186/s12995-019-0244-y] [PMID]
29. Asadollahi S, Dianat I, Nedaei M. Ergonomic Design and Evaluation of Fabric Cutting Scissors with Regard to Pinch Force and Wrist Posture. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics. 2017;5(2):61-6. [DOI:10.21859/joe-05028]
30. Boyles JL, Yearout RD, Rys MJ. Ergonomic scissors for hairdressing. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2003;32(3):199-207. [DOI:10.1016/S0169-8141(03)00064-7]
31. Bervoets DC, Luijsterburg PA, Alessie JJ, Buijs MJ, Verhagen AP. Massage therapy has short-term benefits for people with common musculoskeletal disorders compared to no treatment: a systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy. 2015;61(3):106-16. [DOI:10.1016/j.jphys.2015.05.018]
32. Hasson D, Arnetz B, Jelveus L, Edelstam B. A randomized clinical trial of the treatment effects of massage compared to relaxation tape recordings on diffuse long-term pain. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 2004;73(1):17-24. [DOI:10.1159/000074436] [PMID]
33. Tichauer ER. The Biomechanical Basis of Ergonomics: Anatomy Applied to the Design of Work Situations: Wiley; 1978.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Sport Biomechanics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb