Volume 12, Issue 2 (9-2026)                   J Sport Biomech 2026, 12(2): 358-371 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hosseini Y. Comparison of Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Bag-Carrying on the Vertical Ground Reaction Force During Walking in Healthy Adults. J Sport Biomech 2026; 12 (2) :358-371
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-497-en.html
Department of Sport Science, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran.
Abstract:   (45 Views)
Objective Symmetrical and asymmetrical bag carrying during repetitive activities such as walking may increase mechanical loading and potentially elevate the risk of musculoskeletal injury. Analysis of ground reaction forces (GRF) during walking is therefore of clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to investigate the vertical ground reaction force during different symmetrical and asymmetrical bag-carrying conditions.
Methods Seventeen female university students voluntarily participated in this study. Vertical ground reaction force data were recorded using an RSscan foot scanner at a sampling frequency of 300 Hz. Two asymmetrical carrying conditions (single-hand carrying and single-shoulder carrying) were compared with two symmetrical conditions (backpack and front pack).
Results Carrying a bag with one hand resulted in a significantly higher loading rate compared with single-shoulder carrying (P = 0.007) and backpack carrying (P = 0.005). However, no significant difference in loading rate was observed between single-hand carrying and front-pack carrying (P = 0.051). The time to peak vertical ground reaction force at heel contact was significantly shorter during front-pack carrying compared with single-hand carrying (P = 0.03).
Conclusion Single-hand bag carrying is associated with a significantly greater loading rate compared with single-shoulder and backpack carrying. Given that these impact forces are applied at every heel strike during walking, minimizing single-hand bag carrying may help reduce repetitive mechanical loading.
Full-Text [PDF 1800 kb]   (15 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (14 Views)  
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: Special
Received: 2026/01/26 | Accepted: 2026/02/25 | Published: 2026/04/28

References
1. Hudson S, Cooke C, Davies S, West S, Gamieldien R, Low C, Lloyd R. A comparison of economy and sagittal plane trunk movements among back-, back/front- and head-loading. Ergonomics. 2018;61(9):1216-1222. [DOI:10.1080/00140139.2018.1474267]
2. Zagrodny B, Ludwicki M, Wojnicz W. The influence of external additional loading on the muscle activity and ground reaction forces during gait. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics. 2021;2021:5532012. [DOI:10.1155/2021/5532012]
3. Al-Khabbaz YS, Shimada T, Hasegawa M. The effect of backpack heaviness on trunk-lower extremity muscle activities and trunk posture. Gait and Posture. 2008;28(2):297-302. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.01.002]
4. Adeyemi AJ, Rohani JM, Rani MRA. Backpack-back pain complexity and the need for multifactorial safe weight recommendation. Applied Ergonomics. 2017;58:573-582. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.04.009]
5. Korovessis P, Koureas G, Papazisis Z. Correlation between backpack weight and way of carrying, sagittal and frontal spinal curvatures, athletic activity, and dorsal and low back pain in schoolchildren and adolescents. Clinical Spine Surgery. 2004;17(1):33-40. [DOI:10.1097/00024720-200402000-00008]
6. Abdon APV, Moraes TEG, Prado M, dos Santos Vasconcelos R, Braga TSP, Ferreira TSP, Mont'Alverne DGB. Relationship between shoulder pain and weight of shoulder bags in young women. Motricidade. 2018;14(2-3):40-47. [DOI:10.6063/motricidade.13180]
7. Menezes LTD, Barbosa PHFDA, Costa AS, Mundim AC, Ramos GC, Paz CCSC, Martins EF. Baropodometric technology used to analyze types of weight-bearing during hemiparetic upright position. Fisioterapia em Movimento. 2012;25(1):583-594. [DOI:10.1590/S0103-51502012000300014]
8. Sahrmann S, Azevedo DC, Van Dillen L. Diagnosis and treatment of movement system impairment syndromes. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2017;21(6):391-399. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.08.001]
9. Lederman E. Neuromuscular rehabilitation in manual and physical therapies: Principles to practice. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-443-06969-7.00014-0]
10. Chow DHK, Hin CKF, Ou D, Lai A. Carry-over effects of backpack carriage on trunk posture and repositioning ability. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2011;41(5):530-535. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2011.04.001]
11. Phonpichit C, Chansirinukor W, Akamanon C. The response of the body when carrying a handbag. Work. 2016;55(3):673-678. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-162429]
12. Alami A, Lael-Monfared E, Teimori-Boghsani G, Fouladi B, Jafari A. A study of features of backpack carrying methods by schoolchildren: a population-based study. Journal of Pediatric Perspectives. 2018;6(11):8517-8525.
13. Talar I, Hasiński K, Semmad PA, Zagrodny B. Influence of an asymmetrical load on ground reaction forces during gait. Russian Journal of Biomechanics. 2019;23(4):557-565. [DOI:10.15593/RJBiomech/2019.4.06]
14. Zawadka M, Kochman M, Jablonski M, Gawda P. Effects of external light load on posture and foot pressure distribution in young adults: a pilot study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2021;82:103102. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103102]
15. Anwer S, Li H, Antwi-Afari MF, Umer W, Mehmood I, Wong AYL. Effects of load carrying techniques on gait parameters, dynamic balance, and physiological parameters during a manual material handling task. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2022;29(9):3415-3438. [DOI:10.1108/ECAM-03-2021-0245]
16. Castro MP, Figueiredo MC, Abreu S, Sousa H, Machado L, Santos R, Vilas-Boas JP. The influence of gait cadence on the ground reaction forces and plantar pressures during load carriage of young adults. Applied Ergonomics. 2015;49:41-46. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.01.004]
17. Zadpoor AA, Nikooyan AA. The relationship between lower-extremity stress fractures and the ground reaction force: a systematic review. Clinical Biomechanics. 2011;26(1):23-28. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.08.005]
18. Crowell HP, Davis IS. Gait retraining to reduce lower extremity loading in runners. Clinical Biomechanics. 2011;26(1):78-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.09.003]
19. Cheung RT, Davis IS. Landing pattern modification to improve patellofemoral pain in runners: a case series. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2011;41(12):914-919. [DOI:10.2519/jospt.2011.3771]
20. Davis IS, Bowser BJ, Hamill J. Vertical impact loading in runners with a history of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2010;42(5):682. [DOI:10.1249/01.MSS.0000385903.65728.85]
21. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;39(2):175-191. [DOI:10.3758/BF03193146]
22. Zhou N, Yan J, Zhou J. Effects of different loads schoolbags on body posture of elementary students. China Leather. 2016;45(2):69-73.
23. Robertson DGE, Caldwell GE, Hamill J, Kamen G, Whittlesey S. Research methods in biomechanics. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2013. [DOI:10.5040/9781492595809]
24. Escamilla-Galindo VL, Estal-Martínez A, Adamczyk JG, Brito CJ, Arnaiz-Lastras J, Sillero-Quintana M. Skin temperature response to unilateral training measured with infrared thermography. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation. 2017;13(5):526-532. [DOI:10.12965/jer.1735046.523]
25. Oatis CA. Kinesiology: The mechanics and pathomechanics of human movement. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009.
26. Simonetti E, Bergamini E, Vannozzi G, Bascou J, Pillet H. Estimation of 3D body center of mass acceleration and instantaneous velocity from a wearable inertial sensor network in transfemoral amputee gait: a case study. Sensors. 2021;21(9):3129. [DOI:10.3390/s21093129]
27. Awrejcewicz J, Byczek S, Zagrodny B. Influence of the asymmetric loading of the body during the walk on the temperature distribution. Acta Bio-Optica et Informatica Medica. Biomedical Engineering. 2012;18(2):-.
28. DeVita P, Hong D, Hamill J. Effects of asymmetric load carrying on the biomechanics of walking. Journal of Biomechanics. 1991;24(12):1119-1129. [DOI:10.1016/0021-9290(91)90004-7]
29. Oliaei F, Jafarnezhadgero A, Fatahi A, Khezri D. The effect of using backpacks with different weights on plantar kinetics and balance variables among adolescent females during walking. Iranian Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2024;10(2):1-9.
30. Piri E, Jafarnezhadgero A, Stålman A, Alihosseini S, Panahighaffarkandi Y. Comparison of the ground reaction force frequency spectrum during walking with and without anti-pronation insoles in individuals with pronated feet. Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2025;11(1):20-33. [https://doi.org/10.61186/JSportBiomech.11.1.20]
31. Khazaei G, Ilbeigi S, Saghebjoo M, Farjad Pezeshk A. Effects of a 6-week TRX training program with and without curcumin supplementation on ground reaction forces and center of pressure in overweight women with nonspecific chronic low back pain. Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2026;12(2):264-285. [https://doi.org/10.61882/JSportBiomech.12.2.264]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Sport Biomechanics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb