Volume 10, Issue 3 (11-2024)                   J Sport Biomech 2024, 10(3): 254-260 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Piri E, Jafarnezhadgero A, Stålman A. Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Surgical Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Letter to the Editor. J Sport Biomech 2024; 10 (3) :254-260
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-358-en.html
Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Surgical Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Letter to the Editor
Ebrahim Piri1 , AmirAli Jafarnezhadgero *1 , Anders Stålman2
1- Department of Sports Biomechanics, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
2- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Abstract:   (624 Views)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries are among the most common sports and orthopedic injuries, significantly affecting an individual's physical performance. Treatment varies based on the severity of the injury and the patient's activity level. For partial tears or individuals with lower physical demands, non-surgical approaches—such as physiotherapy, muscle-strengthening exercises, and specialized knee braces—may be recommended. However, in cases of complete rupture, especially in professional athletes or those with high physical demands, surgery is often the preferred treatment option. Various surgical techniques are used for ACL reconstruction, including different grafting methods (autografts, allografts, and synthetic grafts), each with its own advantages and disadvantages. This article aims to provide orthopedic surgeons and specialists with a comprehensive comparison of these techniques, helping them choose the most suitable treatment method.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament, Surgery, Letter to the editor
Full-Text [PDF 1479 kb]   (245 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (266 Views)  
Type of Study: case report | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/02/1 | Accepted: 2025/02/2 | Published: 2025/02/2
References
1. Aziminia M, Abbasi A. Comparing Trunk and Lower Extremity Kinematic Variables during Side-Cutting Maneuver in Healthy and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructed Athletes. Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2022;8(1):50-64. [DOI:10.52547/JSportBiomech.8.1.3]
2. Yalfani A, Ebrahimi Atri A, Taghizadeh Kermani M. The Effectiveness of Preoperative Exercises on the Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2019;5(3):188-199. [DOI:10.32598/biomechanics.5.3.6]
3. Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell Jr FE. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review. The American journal of sports medicine. 2004;32(8):1986-1995. [DOI:10.1177/0363546504271211] [PMID]
4. Samuelsson K, Andersson D, Karlsson J. Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to graft type and surgical technique: an assessment of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2009;25(10):1139-1174. [DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.07.021] [PMID]
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Sport Biomechanics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb