Volume 11, Issue 1 (6-2025)                   J Sport Biomech 2025, 11(1): 64-78 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hashim H, Mohammed S A, Mohammed Ali B, Ismaeel S A, Nasir M. Biceps and Triceps Muscle Activation Under Progressive Loads: A Study on Functional Symmetry of the Upper Limbs. J Sport Biomech 2025; 11 (1) :64-78
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-370-en.html
1- Collage of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Diyala University, Iraq.
2- Collage of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Samarra University, Iraq.
Abstract:   (913 Views)
Objective This study aimed to assess the biomechanical aspects of neuromuscular balance in the upper limbs during closed-chain resistance training with progressively increasing loads. Specifically, it investigated how incremental load variations affect the recruitment of agonist and antagonist muscles and examined the biomechanical relationship between load intensity and muscle coordination.
Methods A total of 22 healthy male participants (aged 23–26 years) with resistance training experience were included. The participants performed upper-limb exercises using a multi-gym resistance machine under a closed-chain kinetic setup. The protocol included three sets at 50%, 75%, and 90% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), each set comprising six repetitions with a 60-second rest interval. Electromyographic (EMG) data were collected using a MyoTrace 400 system, with surface electrodes placed on agonist and antagonist muscles following Noraxon placement standards. EMG signals were processed to compute root mean square (RMS) values, normalized to each participant’s maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Statistical comparisons were performed using paired t-tests and one-way ANOVA (with Bonferroni post-hoc tests), with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results EMG activity in both the biceps (agonist) and triceps (antagonist) muscles showed significant increases as the load progressed from 50% to 90% 1RM. At the highest load (90% 1RM), no statistically significant difference was observed between the right and left limb EMG amplitudes, indicating a high degree of bilateral neuromuscular symmetry. These results align with previous biomechanical studies demonstrating that progressive loading enhances motor unit recruitment and influences agonist–antagonist muscle activation patterns.
Conclusion Closed-chain resistance training with incremental loading provides biomechanical evidence of enhanced upper limb muscle recruitment, contributing to improved movement stability, motor control, and neuromuscular balance. These findings highlight the importance of progressive resistance training in both athletic and rehabilitative settings for optimizing performance and reducing injury risk. Future research should further explore the effects of varying rest intervals and repetition schemes on neuromuscular adaptation to refine training guidelines.
Full-Text [PDF 2050 kb]   (103 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (264 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2025/03/17 | Accepted: 2025/04/12 | Published: 2025/04/12

References
1. Lephart SM, Pincivero DM, Giraido JL, Fu FH. The role of proprioception in the management and rehabilitation of athletic injuries. The American journal of sports medicine. 1997;25(1):130-137. [DOI:10.1177/036354659702500126] [PMID]
2. Baumeister J, Reinecke K, Liesen H, Weiss M. Cortical activity of skilled performance in a complex sports related motor task. European journal of applied physiology. 2008;104:625-631. [DOI:10.1007/s00421-008-0811-x] [PMID]
3. Aagaard P. Training-induced changes in neural function. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. 2003;31(2):61-67. [DOI:10.1097/00003677-200304000-00002] [PMID]
4. Folland JP, Williams AG. Morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength. Sports medicine. 2007;37:145-168. [DOI:10.2165/00007256-200737020-00004] [PMID]
5. Enoka RM, Duchateau J. Rate coding and the control of muscle force. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2017;7(10):a029702. [DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a029702] [PMID]
6. Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Stone MH. The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports medicine. 2016;46:1419-1449. [DOI:10.1007/s40279-016-0486-0] [PMID]
7. Škarabot J, Brownstein CG, Casolo A, Del Vecchio A, Ansdell P. The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2021;121:675-685. [DOI:10.1007/s00421-020-04567-3] [PMID]
8. Prentice WE. Open vs Closed Kinetic Chain Exercise in Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Techniques for Sports Medicine and Athletic Training: Routledge. 2024;305-328. [DOI:10.4324/9781003526308-15]
9. Merletti R, Parker PJ. Electromyography: physiology, engineering, and non-invasive applications: John Wiley & Sons; 2004. [DOI:10.1002/0471678384] []
10. Hamid JAK, Salama OA-I, Sadiq AJ, Jasim TA, Ismaeel SA. Three-Dimensional Quantitative Analysis of Kinematic Variables in Discus Throwing Performance. Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2025;10(4):310-322. [DOI:10.61186/JSportBiomech.10.4.310]
11. Ismaeel SA. Comparing the Anthropometric Characteristics and Physical Fitness of the School-Students with High and Low Levels of Physical Activity. interventions. 2024;18:20.
12. Bibbins-Domingo K, Brubaker L, Curfman G. The 2024 revision to the Declaration of Helsinki: modern ethics for medical research. JAMA. 2025;333(1):30-31. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.22530] [PMID]
13. Konrad P. The abc of emg. A practical introduction to kinesiological electromyography. 2005;1(2005):30-35.
14. Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. Journal of applied physiology. 2004;96(4):1486-1495. [DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.01070.2003] [PMID]
15. Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: Sage publications limited; 2024.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Sport Biomechanics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb