Volume 6, Issue 3 (12-2020)                   J Sport Biomech 2020, 6(3): 180-189 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rokninejad M, Hashemi S H. Evaluation of Floor Pressure Distribution in Female Athletes With Tibial Internal Pressure Syndrome. J Sport Biomech 2020; 6 (3) :180-189
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-234-en.html
Evaluation of Floor Pressure Distribution in Female Athletes With Tibial Internal Pressure Syndrome
Mojgan Rokninejad * 1, Seyyedeh Hanniyeh Hashemi2
1- Department of Sports Science, Faculty of Sports Sciences, South Tehran Branch, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Sports Science, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Shoushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran.
Abstract:   (1844 Views)
Objective: Internal tibial pressure syndrome is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in athletes. Muscle imbalance in the dorsiflexor and plantar flexor muscles of the ankle in this syndrome may affect the distribution of plantar pressure in different parts of the foot. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate plantar pressure distribution in female athletes with tibial internal pressure syndrome.
Methods: The statistical sample of this study, a comparative analytical study, consisted of 70 female athletes in the field of physical education in Tehran (including 35 subjects with tibial pressure syndrome and 35 healthy subjects in the age range of 18-22 years), which were randomly selected and purposefully selected. Plantar pressure values during walking between the experimental and control groups were assessed using a foot scan device in ten areas of the sole. The data of this study were analyzed using an independent t-test.
Results: This study showed that the distribution of plantar pressure in the group with tibia internal pressure syndrome in 6 variables of the first toe, first metatarsus, second metatarsus, third metatarsus, midfoot, and heel was higher than the control group (P≤0.05). But the other measured variables of plantar pressure, which include the second to fifth toe, fourth metatarsus, fifth metatarsus, and the outer part of the heel, are not significant in both groups (P≥0.05).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, the hypothesis is supported that plantar pressure distribution may be higher in people with tibial internal pressure syndrome. This increase in plantar pressure can be due to excessive pronation of the ankle. Future studies should focus on the effects of therapies on reducing plantar pressure in people with the syndrome.
Keywords: Plantar pressure, Tibial internal pressure syndrome, Female athletes
Full-Text [PDF 3650 kb]   (1261 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (1636 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/08/25 | Accepted: 2020/09/20 | Published: 2020/12/1
References
1. رفرنس های متنی مثل خروجی کراس رف را در اینجا وارد کرده و تایید کنید Almeida S, et al. Gender differences in musculoskeletal injury rates: a function of symptom reporting? Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 18)12)31:1807 . [DOI:10.1097/00005768-199912000-00017] [PMID]
2. Brewer RB, Gregory AJM. Chronic lower leg pain in athletes: a guide for the differential diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. Sports Health.2012;4)2):121-7. [DOI:10.1177/1941738111426115] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Yates B, White S, et al. The Incidence and Risk Factors in the Development of Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome among Naval Recruits. The American Journal of Sports Medicine2004; 780 32:772 . [DOI:10.1177/0095399703258776] [PMID]
4. Clement DB. Tibial stress syndrome in athletes. AM J Sports Med 1974; 2: 81-85. [DOI:10.1177/036354657400200203] [PMID]
5. Subotnik SI. The shin splints syndrome of the lower extremity. J Am Podiatry Assoc 1976; 66)1): 43-45. [DOI:10.7547/87507315-66-1-43] [PMID]
6. Garnock C, Witchalls J, Newman P. Predicting individual risk for medial tibial stress syndrome in navy recruits. Journal of science and medicine in sport. 2018 Jun 1;21(6):586-90. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.020] [PMID]
7. Bliekendaal S, Moen M, Fokker Y, Stubbe JH, Twisk J, Verhagen E. Incidence and risk factors of medial tibial stress syndrome: a prospective study in Physical Education Teacher Education students. BMJ open sport & exercise medicine. 2018 Oct 1;4(1). [DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000421] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Bandholm T, Boysen L, Haugaard S, Zebis MK, Bencke J. Foot medial longitudinal-arch deformation during quiet standing and gait in subjects with medial tibial stress syndrome. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery. 2008 Mar 1;47(2):89-95. [DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2007.10.015] [PMID]
9. Bennett JE, Reinking MF, Pluemer B, Pentel A, Seaton M, Killian C. Factors contributing to the development of medial tibial stress syndrome in high school runners. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2001 Sep;31(9):504-10. [DOI:10.2519/jospt.2001.31.9.504] [PMID]
10. DeLacerda FG. A study of anatomical factors involved in shinsplints. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1980 Oct 1;2(2):55-9. [DOI:10.2519/jospt.1980.2.2.55] [PMID]
11. Moen MH, Bongers T, Bakker EW, Zimmermann WO, Weir A, Tol JL, Backx FJ. Risk factors and prognostic indicators for medial tibial stress syndrome. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2012 Feb;22(1):34-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01144.x] [PMID]
12. Moen MH, Bongers T, Bakker EW, Zimmermann WO, Weir A, Tol JL, Backx FJ. Risk factors and prognostic indicators for medial tibial stress syndrome. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2012 Feb;22(1):34-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01144.x] [PMID]
13. Alavi-Mehr SM, Jafarnezhadgero A, Salari-Esker F, Zago M. Acute effect of foot orthoses on frequency domain of ground reaction forces in male children with flexible flatfeet during walking. The Foot. 2018;1;37:77-84. [DOI:10.1016/j.foot.2018.05.003] [PMID]
14. Abdi E, Eslami M, Taghi Pou M R. Identifying the Best Indicator of Assessing the Athletes Balance in the Sudden Perturbation Test. J Sport Biomech. 2016; 2 (1) :57-66
15. Safaaeepoor Z, Ebrahimi I, Saeedi H, Kamali M. (Investigation of dynamic plantar pressure distribution in healthy adults during standing and walking (Persian). Journal of Rehabilitation. 2009; 10(2): 8-15.
16. Urry S. Plantar pressure-measurement sensors. Meas Sci Technol. 1999; 10(1): R16-32. [DOI:10.1088/0957-0233/10/1/017]
17. Bus SA, de Lange A. A comparison of the 1-step, 2-step, and 3- step protocols for obtaining barefoot plantar pressure data in the diabetic neuropathic foot. Clin Biomech. 2005; 20(9): 892-899. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.05.004] [PMID]
18. Bus SA, Valk GD, van Deursen RW, Armstrong DG, Caravaggi C, Hlavácek P, et al. The effectiveness of footwear and offloading interventions to prevent and heal foot ulcers and reduce plantar pressure in diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008; 24(Suppl 1): S162-180. [DOI:10.1002/dmrr.850] [PMID]
19. Wearing SC, Urry S, Smeathers JE. A comparision of gait initiation and termination methods for obtaining plantar foot pressure. Gait & Posture. 1999; 10: 255-263. [DOI:10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00039-9]
20. Sharma J, Golby J, Greeves J, Spears IR. Biomechanical and lifestyle risk factors for medial tibia stress syndrome in army recruits: a prospective study. Gait & posture. 2011 Mar 1;33(3):361-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.12.002] [PMID]
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Sport Biomechanics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb