Volume 6, Issue 4 (3-2021)                   J Sport Biomech 2021, 6(4): 250-263 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khanjari Y, Arabameri E. Investigating the Asymmetric Bimanual Coordination Differences in Male and Female Athletes in Ball and Non-ball Sports. J Sport Biomech. 2021; 6 (4) :250-263
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-241-en.html
1- Department of Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (774 Views)
Objective: Bilateral coordination skills are one of the key factors in performing simple to skillful sports task, so far the differences between ball and non-ball fields have not been determined. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the differences in asymmetric bilateral coordination between male and female athletes in ballplayers and non-ballplayers.
Methods: The samples of this study were randomly selected from the young girls and boys (Mean±SD of age 26.00±4.50) in ball fields (14) and non-ball fields (16) of the Faculty of Physical Education of the University of Tehran. All subjects had complete visual acuity and the consent form of the research. The instrument of Vienna was used to measure peripheral visual.
Results: The statistical results of MANOVA test showed that there is significant difference in asymmetrical bilateral coordination between ballplayers and non-ballplayers and girls and boys (P≥0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that asymmetric bilateral coordination performing in ball players had better than non-ball players and girls than boys. According the importance of bimanual coordination skills in the implementation of championship sports, as well as considering gender differences and the positive impact of ball exercises on ball coordination, sports coaches can provide training, especially at a younger age, to facilitate learning of this fundamental skill.
Full-Text [PDF 6072 kb]   (600 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (528 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/12/3 | Accepted: 2020/12/11 | Published: 2021/03/1

1. Otte E, van Mier HI. Bimanual interference in children performing a dual motor task. Human movement science. 2006;25(4-5):678-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.008] [PMID]
2. Byblow WD, Summers JJ, Semjen A, Wuyts IJ, Carson RG. Spontaneous and intentional pattern switching in a multisegmental bimanual coordination task. Motor control. 1999;3(4):372-93. [DOI:10.1123/mcj.3.4.372] [PMID]
3. Swinnen S, De Pooter A, Delrue S. Moving away from the in-phase attractor during bimanual oscillations. Studies in perception and action Rodopi, Amsterdam. 1991:315-9.
4. Swinnen SP. Intermanual coordination: from behavioural principles to neural-network interactions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2002;3(5):348. [DOI:10.1038/nrn807] [PMID]
5. Wenderoth N, Puttemans V, Vangheluwe S, Swinnen SP. Bimanual training reduces spatial interference. Journal of motor behavior. 2003;35(3):296-308. [DOI:10.1080/00222890309602142] [PMID]
6. Swinnen SP, Dounskaia N, Duysens J. Patterns of bimanual interference reveal movement encoding within a radial egocentric reference frame. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 2002;14(3):463-71. [DOI:10.1162/089892902317361976] [PMID]
7. Wiesendanger M, Rouiller EM, Kazennikov O, Perrig S. Is the supplementary motor area a bilaterally organized system? Advances in neurology. 1996;70:85.
8. Jäncke L, Peters M, Himmelbach M, Nösselt T, Shah J, Steinmetz H. fMRI study of bimanual coordination. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(2):164-74. [DOI:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00062-7]
9. Toyokura M, Muro I, Komiya T, Obara M. Relation of bimanual coordination to activation in the sensorimotor cortex and supplementary motor area: analysis using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain research bulletin. 1999;48(2):211-7. [DOI:10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00165-8]
10. Kazennikov O, Hyland B, Corboz M, Babalian A, Rouiller E, Wiesendanger M. Neural activity of supplementary and primary motor areas in monkeys and its relation to bimanual and unimanual movement sequences. Neuroscience. 1999;89(3):661-74. [DOI:10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00348-0]
11. de Oliveira SC. The neuronal basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models. Acta psychologica. 2002;110(2-3):139-59. [DOI:10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00031-8]
12. Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological review. 1975;82(4):225. [DOI:10.1037/h0076770]
13. Schmidt RA, Zelaznik H, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn Jr JT. Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological review. 1979;86(5):415. [DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.86.5.415]
14. Marteniuk RG, &MacKenzie, C. L. Information processing in movement organization and execution. Attention and Performance. 1980(VIII):29-57.
15. Turvey MT. Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. Perceiving, acting and knowing. 1977:211-65.
16. Kugler PN, Kelso JS, Turvey M. On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures: I. Theoretical lines of convergence. Tutorials in motor behavior. 1980;3:3-47. [DOI:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61936-6]
17. J. R. Antropomotorics. Theory of human motorics. Warszawa: Medical publishing PZWL [in Polish]. 2010.
18. Lin C-H, Chou L-W, Wei S-H, Lieu F-K, Chiang S-L, Sung W-H. Influence of aging on bimanual coordination control. Experimental gerontology. 2014;53:40-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.exger.2014.02.005] [PMID]
19. Wang C, Shea C. Author accepted manuscript: Bimanual Control Strategies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2018:1747021818781772.
20. Mason AH, Bruyn JL. Manual asymmetries in bimanual prehension tasks: Manipulation of object size and object distance. Human movement science. 2009;28(1):48-73. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2008.09.002] [PMID]
21. Riek S, Tresilian JR, Mon-Williams M, Coppard VL, Carson RG. Bimanual aiming and overt attention: one law for two hands. Experimental brain research. 2003;153(1):59-75. [DOI:10.1007/s00221-003-1581-7] [PMID]
22. Olivier I, Hay L, Bard C, Fleury M. Age-related differences in the reaching and grasping coordination in children: unimanual and bimanual tasks. Experimental brain research. 2007;179(1):17-27. [DOI:10.1007/s00221-006-0762-6] [PMID]
23. Granek JA, Gorbet DJ, Sergio LE. Extensive video-game experience alters cortical networks for complex visuomotor transformations. Cortex. 2010;46(9):1165-77. [DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.10.009] [PMID]
24. Albines D. Sex-and Experience-Related Differences in Bimanual Coordination Development. 2014.
25. Poole JL, Burtner PA, Torres TA, McMullen CK, Markham A, Marcum ML, et al. Measuring dexterity in children using the Nine-hole Peg Test. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2005;18(3):348-51. [DOI:10.1197/j.jht.2005.04.003] [PMID]
26. Loftesnes J, Sigmundsson H, Ingvaldsen R. Sex differences in bimanual coordination. Nordisk Fysioterapi. 2004;8(1):43-7.
27. Schuhfried G P, J., & Bauer,W. . Teste de Percepção Periférica. In D. Kallweit (Eds.), Catalog Vienna test system. Computerized psychological assessement. 2006:78-9.
28. Amirjani N, Ashworth NL, Gordon T, Edwards DC, Chan KM. Normative values and the effects of age, gender, and handedness on the Moberg Pick‐Up Test. Muscle & Nerve: Official Journal of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 2007;35(6):788-92. [DOI:10.1002/mus.20750] [PMID]
29. Cohen NR, Pomplun M, Gold BJ, Sekuler R. Sex differences in the acquisition of complex skilled movements. Experimental brain research. 2010;205(2):183-93. [DOI:10.1007/s00221-010-2351-y] [PMID]
30. McCullough K, Granek J, Sergio L. Visuomotor skill performance asymmetries related to sex and athletic experience. APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM. 2006;31:S57.
31. Chraif M, Anitei M. Gender differences in motor coordination at young students at psychology. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity. 2013;3(2):147. [DOI:10.7763/IJSSH.2013.V3.215]
32. Allen LS, Richey MF, Chai YM, Gorski RA. Sex differences in the corpus callosum of the living human being. Journal of Neuroscience. 1991;11(4):933-42. [DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-04-00933.1991] [PMID] [PMCID]
33. Barral J, Debu B, Rival C. Developmental changes in unimanual and bimanual aiming movements. Developmental neuropsychology. 2006;29(3):415-29. [DOI:10.1207/s15326942dn2903_2] [PMID]
34. Giedd JN, Rumsey JM, Castellanos FX, Rajapakse JC, Kaysen D, Vaituzis AC, et al. A quantitative MRI study of the corpus callosum in children and adolescents. Developmental Brain Research. 1996;91(2):274-80. [DOI:10.1016/0165-3806(95)00193-X]
35. Junaid KA, Fellowes S. Gender differences in the attainment of motor skills on the movement assessment battery for children. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics. 2006;26(1-2):5-11. [DOI:10.1080/J006v26n01_02]
36. Flatters I, Hill LJ, Williams JH, Barber SE, Mon-Williams M. Manual control age and sex differences in 4 to 11 year old children. PloS one. 2014;9(2):e88692. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0088692] [PMID] [PMCID]
37. Fujii S, Kudo K, Ohtsuki T, Oda S. Intrinsic constraint of asymmetry acting as a control parameter on rapid, rhythmic bimanual coordination: a study of professional drummers and nondrummers. Journal of neurophysiology. 2010;104(4):2178-86. [DOI:10.1152/jn.00882.2009] [PMID] [PMCID]
38. Jäncke L, Shah N, Peters M. Cortical activations in primary and secondary motor areas for complex bimanual movements in professional pianists. Cognitive Brain Research. 2000;10(1-2):177-83. [DOI:10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00028-8]
39. Doostan M. The study of Transfer of Asymmetrical Bimanual Movement to its Converse Pattern: Analysis on Bimanual Movements Theories. journal of motor behaviour and sport psychlogy. 2012;4(1):553-64.(in persian).
40. Moradi A. The effect of increasing age and volleyball experience on continuous bilateral coordination task. journal of sport sciences. 2011;2(5):5-18.(in persian).
41. Carroll TJ, Benjamin B, Stephan R, Carson RG. Resistance training enhances the stability of sensorimotor coordination. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 2001;268(1464):221-7. [DOI:10.1098/rspb.2000.1356] [PMID] [PMCID]
42. khanjari Y, Tahmasebi S. Investigating the differences in peripheral visual perception in ballplayers and non-ballplayers: emphasis on the maturational perspective. motor and behaviour sciences. 2019;2(2):126-36.(in persian).
43. Sahan A, Erman KA. The effect of the tennis technical training on coordination characterictics. The Open Sports Medicine Journal. 2009;3:59-65. [DOI:10.2174/1874387000903010059]
44. Roh M. A Comparison of Head-Hand Coordination Patterns during Squash Forehand Strokes in Expert and Less-Skilled Squash Players. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2018;28(2):109-17.
45. Srinivasan D. Visuomotor Coordination in Symmetric and Asymmetric Bimanual Reaching Tasks. 2010.
46. Johansson RS, Westling G, Bäckström A, Flanagan JR. Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. Journal of Neuroscience. 2001;21(17):6917-32. [DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-17-06917.2001] [PMID] [PMCID]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Sport Biomechanics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb