Volume 7, Issue 2 (8-2021)
J Sport Biomech 2021, 7(2): 94-107 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Soltani N, Jalalvand A, Jahani M R. Comparison of Plantar Force, Pressure and Impulse During Walking in Men and Women With Flat Feet. J Sport Biomech 2021; 7 (2) :94-107
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-257-en.html
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-257-en.html
1- Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Humanities, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.
Abstract: (1951 Views)
Objective: This study aims to compare the variables of plantar force, pressure and impulse during walking in men and women with flat feet.
Methods: The study population consists of non-athlete students with and without flat feet. Of these, 48 (male and female) were selected as study samples. The peak pressure, force and impulse on the foot were measured during walking by a foot scanner at a sampling frequency of 253 Hz. Shapiro-Wilks test was used to examine the normality of data distribution, and data analysis was performed using MANOVA in SPSS software, considering the significance level at P<0.05.
Results: Men with flat feet had more peak plantar pressure and force in the midfoot than healthy men, and more peak plantar pressure on the hallux. Women with flat feet had more peak plantar pressure and force on the hallux, toes T2-T3-T4-T5, M2 metatarsal head, and midfoot than healthy women. Men with flat feet had peak plantar pressure on the M4 metatarsal head than women with flat feet. Men with flat feet had different plantar impulses in the hallux, M2 metatarsal head, and lateral heal. Women with flat feet had more plantar impulses in the hallux, toes T2-T3-T4-T5, and midfoot than healthy women. There was a significant difference between men and women with flat feet in plantar impulses in metatarsal heads M3 and M4, midfoot, and lateral and medial heels
Conclusion: Different effects of gender and sole structure on the distribution of plantar pressure should be considered in the production and design of shoes, medical insoles and special sports footwear.
Methods: The study population consists of non-athlete students with and without flat feet. Of these, 48 (male and female) were selected as study samples. The peak pressure, force and impulse on the foot were measured during walking by a foot scanner at a sampling frequency of 253 Hz. Shapiro-Wilks test was used to examine the normality of data distribution, and data analysis was performed using MANOVA in SPSS software, considering the significance level at P<0.05.
Results: Men with flat feet had more peak plantar pressure and force in the midfoot than healthy men, and more peak plantar pressure on the hallux. Women with flat feet had more peak plantar pressure and force on the hallux, toes T2-T3-T4-T5, M2 metatarsal head, and midfoot than healthy women. Men with flat feet had peak plantar pressure on the M4 metatarsal head than women with flat feet. Men with flat feet had different plantar impulses in the hallux, M2 metatarsal head, and lateral heal. Women with flat feet had more plantar impulses in the hallux, toes T2-T3-T4-T5, and midfoot than healthy women. There was a significant difference between men and women with flat feet in plantar impulses in metatarsal heads M3 and M4, midfoot, and lateral and medial heels
Conclusion: Different effects of gender and sole structure on the distribution of plantar pressure should be considered in the production and design of shoes, medical insoles and special sports footwear.
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2021/06/23 | Accepted: 2021/06/26 | Published: 2021/09/1
Received: 2021/06/23 | Accepted: 2021/06/26 | Published: 2021/09/1
References
1. Levangie PK, Norkin CC. Joint structure and function: a comprehensive analysis. 2011.
2. Kisner C, Colby LA, Borstad J. Therapeutic exercise: foundations and techniques: Fa Davis; 2017.
3. Bonato P, Ebenbichler GR, Roy SH, Lehr S, Posch M, Kollmitzer J, et al. Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task. Spine. 2003;28(16):1810-20. [DOI:10.1097/01.BRS.0000087500.70575.45] [PMID]
4. Pauk J, Daunoraviciene K, Ihnatouski M, Griskevicius J, Raso JV. Analysis of the plantar pressure distribution in children with foot deformities. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2010;12(1):29-34.
5. Van Boerum DH, Sangeorzan BJ. Biomechanics and pathophysiology of flat foot. Foot and ankle clinics. 2003;8(3):419-30. [DOI:10.1016/S1083-7515(03)00084-6]
6. Turner D, Helliwell PS, Burton AK, Woodburn J. The relationship between passive range of motion and range of motion during gait and plantar pressure measurements. Diabetic Medicine. 2007;24(11):1240-6. [DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02233.x] [PMID]
7. Kwon O-Y, Mueller MJ. Walking patterns used to reduce forefoot plantar pressures in people with diabetic neuropathies. Physical therapy. 2001;81(2):828-35. [DOI:10.1093/ptj/81.2.828] [PMID]
8. Safaei-Pour Z, Ebrahimi E, Saeedi H, Kamali M. Invesigation of dynamic plantar pressure distribution in healthy adults during standing and walking. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2009;10(2):0-.
9. Qu X, Yeo JC. Effects of load carriage and fatigue on gait characteristics. Journal of biomechanics. 2011;44(7):1259-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.02.016] [PMID]
10. Nagel A, Fernholz F, Kibele C, Rosenbaum D. Long distance running increases plantar pressures beneath the metatarsal heads: a barefoot walking investigation of 200 marathon runners. Gait & posture. 2008;27(1):152-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.012] [PMID]
11. Chui KC, Jorge M, Yen S-C, Lusardi MM. Orthotics and Prosthetics in Rehabilitation E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019.
12. Jenkins J, Ellis C, editors. Using ground reaction forces from gait analysis: Body mass as a weak biometric. International conference on pervasive computing; 2007: Springer.
13. Niu W, Feng T, Jiang C, Zhang M. Peak vertical ground reaction force during two-leg landing: a systematic review and mathematical modeling. BioMed research international. 2014;2014. [DOI:10.1155/2014/126860] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods. 2007;39(2):175-91. [DOI:10.3758/BF03193146] [PMID]
15. Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. A protocol for classifying normal-and flat-arched foot posture for research studies using clinical and radiographic measurements. Journal of foot and ankle research. 2009;2(1):22. [DOI:10.1186/1757-1146-2-22] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Jonely H, Brismée J-M, Sizer Jr PS, James CR. Relationships between clinical measures of static foot posture and plantar pressure during static standing and walking. Clinical Biomechanics. 2011;26(8):873-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.04.008] [PMID]
17. Chuckpaiwong B, Nunley JA, Mall NA, Queen RM. The effect of foot type on in-shoe plantar pressure during walking and running. Gait & posture. 2008;28(3):405-11. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.01.012] [PMID]
18. Willems TM, De Ridder R, Roosen P. The effect of a long-distance run on plantar pressure distribution during running. Gait & posture. 2012;35(3):405-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.10.362] [PMID]
19. Buldt AK, Murley GS, Butterworth P, Levinger P, Menz HB, Landorf KB. The relationship between foot posture and lower limb kinematics during walking: A systematic review. Gait & posture. 2013;38(3):363-72. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.010] [PMID]
20. Perttunen J. Foot loading in normal and pathological walking: University of Jyväskylä; 2002.
21. Wearing SC, Urry S, Smeathers JE, Battistutta D. A comparison of gait initiation and termination methods for obtaining plantar foot pressures. Gait & posture. 1999;10(3):255-63. [DOI:10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00039-9]
22. Levangie P, Norkin C. Joint structure and function: a comprehensive analysis FA Davis Company. 2011.
23. Ledoux WR, Hillstrom HJ. The distributed plantar vertical force of neutrally aligned and pes planus feet. Gait & posture. 2002;15(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00165-5]
24. Hillstrom HJ, Song J, Kraszewski AP, Hafer JF, Mootanah R, Dufour AB, et al. Foot type biomechanics part 1: structure and function of the asymptomatic foot. Gait & posture. 2013;37(3):445-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.09.007] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Post WR, Teitge R, Amis A. Patellofemoral malalignment: looking beyond the viewbox. Clinics in sports medicine. 2002;21(3):521-46, x. [DOI:10.1016/S0278-5919(02)00011-X]
26. Gokeler A, Hof A, Arnold M, Dijkstra P, Postema K, Otten E. Abnormal landing strategies after ACL reconstruction. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2010;20(1):e12-e9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00873.x] [PMID]
27. Hunt AE, Smith RM. Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking. Clinical biomechanics. 2004;19(4):391-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.12.010] [PMID]
28. Queen RM, Mall NA, Nunley JA, Chuckpaiwong B. Differences in plantar loading between flat and normal feet during different athletic tasks. Gait & posture. 2009;29(4):582-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.12.010] [PMID]
29. Cornwall MW, McPoil TG, Fishco WD, O'Donnell D, Hunt L, Lane C. The influence of first ray mobility on forefoot plantar pressure and hindfoot kinematics during walking. Foot & ankle international. 2006;27(7):539-47. [DOI:10.1177/107110070602700710] [PMID]
30. Mootanah R, Song J, Lenhoff MW, Hafer JF, Backus SI, Gagnon D, et al. Foot Type Biomechanics Part 2: are structure and anthropometrics related to function? Gait & posture. 2013;37(3):452-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.09.008] [PMID] [PMCID]
31. Memar R, Noori S. Comparison of plantar pressure distribution between the right and left foot and their correlation with height and weight at wrestlers. Research in Sport Medicine and Technology. 2016;14(12):45-57. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jsmt.14.12.45]
32. Cho S, Park J, Kwon O. Gender differences in three dimensional gait analysis data from 98 healthy Korean adults. Clinical biomechanics. 2004;19(2):145-52. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.10.003] [PMID]
33. Sun D, Fekete G, Mei Q, Gu Y. The effect of walking speed on the foot inter-segment kinematics, ground reaction forces and lower limb joint moments. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5517. [DOI:10.7717/peerj.5517] [PMID] [PMCID]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Journal of Sport Biomechanics
Department of Sport Biomechanics, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch, Prof. Mousivand Blvd, Imam Khomeini Blvd, Hamedan, Iran.
Journal Tel: +98 81 34494042
Website: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir
Email: sportbiomechanics@iauh.ac.ir
