Volume 8, Issue 4 (3-2023)
J Sport Biomech 2023, 8(4): 330-342 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Malekipooya M. Designing and Manufacturing Smart Sports-Medical Shoes. J Sport Biomech 2023; 8 (4) :330-342
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-305-en.html
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-305-en.html
Department of Exercise Physiology, Professor Hesabi Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tafresh, Iran.
Abstract: (1021 Views)
Objective The foot is the most important organ of interaction between the ground and the human body, and its functional structure is very influential on the correct walking pattern. Examining the kinetic factors affecting the soles of the feet during static and dynamic exercises is of particular importance due to the anatomical structure of the soles of the feet. Therefore, the researcher designed and manufactured smart sports-medical shoes.
Methods The present laboratory study was designed for the design and manufacture of smart medical shoes based on the sensitive sensors, time, acceleration, displacement and temperature design. This device is programmed for quantitative description and classification of different forms of exercise in field and laboratory conditions. For this purpose, the sensors were embedded in the shoes in order to develop sports technology and movement mechanics by quantifying the information. In addition to the low cost, it is easy to use in the real training environments. The device is made up of different hardware and software components that send and receive the information in the shoe wirelessly by the module. The information thus obtained is entered into the computer and is reviewed and analyzed with the advanced programming language C.
Results IThe output results from sensors are given to the researcher and trainer for decision making. It can also exhibit the amount of pressure. After analyzing the information, the researcher describes and analyzes the data and reviews it.
Conclusion These shoes can help with the help of athlete's results as well as in some foot damage along with other equipment.
Methods The present laboratory study was designed for the design and manufacture of smart medical shoes based on the sensitive sensors, time, acceleration, displacement and temperature design. This device is programmed for quantitative description and classification of different forms of exercise in field and laboratory conditions. For this purpose, the sensors were embedded in the shoes in order to develop sports technology and movement mechanics by quantifying the information. In addition to the low cost, it is easy to use in the real training environments. The device is made up of different hardware and software components that send and receive the information in the shoe wirelessly by the module. The information thus obtained is entered into the computer and is reviewed and analyzed with the advanced programming language C.
Results IThe output results from sensors are given to the researcher and trainer for decision making. It can also exhibit the amount of pressure. After analyzing the information, the researcher describes and analyzes the data and reviews it.
Conclusion These shoes can help with the help of athlete's results as well as in some foot damage along with other equipment.
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2022/11/29 | Accepted: 2023/03/2 | Published: 2023/03/16
Received: 2022/11/29 | Accepted: 2023/03/2 | Published: 2023/03/16
References
1. Ledoux WR, Hillstrom HJ. The distributed plantar vertical force of neutrally aligned and pes planus feet. Gait & posture. 2002;15(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00165-5] [PMID]
2. Zifchock RA, Davis I. A comparison of semi-custom and custom foot orthotic devices in high-and low-arched individuals during walking. Clinical biomechanics. 2008;23(10): 1287. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.07.008] [PMID]
3. Hafezi H.S. M., Banai A. Design and fabrication of three axes accelerometer, Research in Sport Medicine and Technology. 2012;2(4):11-17. [Persian].
4. Richards JG. The measurement of human motion: A comparison of commercially available systems, Human Movement Science. 1999;18(5):589-602. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00023-8]
5. Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, Wiley, 2009. [DOI:10.1002/9780470549148]
6. Rong Z, Zhaoying Z. A real-time articulated human motion tracking using tri-axis inertial/magnetic sensors package, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineeringk. 2004;12(2): 29. [DOI:10.1109/TNSRE.2004.827825] [PMID]
7. Roetenberg D. Inertial and magnetic sensing of human motion, These de doctorat, 2006.
8. Pellegrini A, Tonino P, Paladini P, Cutti A, Ceccarelli F, Porcellini G. Motion analysis assessment of alterations in the scapulo-humeral rhythm after throwing in baseball pitchers, Musculoskeletal surgery. 2013; 97(1):9-13. [DOI:10.1007/s12306-013-0253-4] [PMID]
9. Meng Z, Yuan W, Kang Y. Plantar pressure distribution during barefoot and shod race walking. Journal of Biomechanics. 2007;40(2):534. [Persian]. [DOI:10.1016/S0021-9290(07)70524-9]
10. Gary B. Wilkerson & Ed Behan. The advantages of a dynamic stability system compared to a static force plate system for orthopedic and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Clinical Resource Manual. 1999;3(7):3-12.
11. Lee MS, Vanore JV, Thomas J, Catanzariti AR, Kogler G, Kravitz SR, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of adult flatfoot. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2005,44(2):78-113. [DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2004.12.001] [PMID]
12. Chen YC, Lou SZ, Huang CY, Su FC. Effects of foot orthoses on gait patterns of flat feet patients. Clinical biomechanics. 2010;25(3):265. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.11.007] [PMID]
13. Boyer R, Gitter A, Barnes L. Determination of ankle muscle power in normal gait using an EMG-to-force processing approach. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2010;20:46-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.09.013] [PMID]
14. Stewart L, Gibson J, Thomson CE. In-shoe pressure distribution in "unstable"(MBT) shoes and flat-bottomed training shoes: a comparative study. Gait & posture. 2007;25(4): 648-651. [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.06.012] [PMID]
15. Gandamakar E, Eslami M, Naghizadeh Qomi M, Gandmakar A. Effectiveness of the work on the basis of the work in the fields of the panels with the panels of the panels and the years. Applied physiology research paper J. 2012;11(21):117-124. [Persian].
16. Bacarin TA, Canettieri MG, Akashi PMH, Sacco ICN. Plantar pressure distribution differences between flat and normal feet in healthy subjects. Journal of biomechanics. 2006;39(1):111. [DOI:10.1016/S0021-9290(06)83341-5]
17. Simkin A, Leichter I, Giladi M, Stein M, Milgrom C. Combined effect of foot arch structure and an orthotic device on stress fractures. Foot & ankle. 1989;10(1): 25. [DOI:10.1177/107110078901000105] [PMID]
18. Zadpoor A, Asadi Nikooyan A. The relationship between lower-extremity stress fractures and the ground reaction force: A systematic review. Clinical Biomechanics. 2011; (26):23-28. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.08.005] [PMID]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Journal of Sport Biomechanics
Department of Sport Biomechanics, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch, Prof. Mousivand Blvd, Imam Khomeini Blvd, Hamedan, Iran.
Journal Tel: +98 81 34494042
Website: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir
Email: sportbiomechanics@iauh.ac.ir
