Volume 12, Issue 2 (9-2026)                   J Sport Biomech 2026, 12(2): 210-222 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Farjad Pezeshk A, Sadeghi H, Mousavi Z, Bijari M. Effects of Sports Surface Stiffness on Time–Frequency Features of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces During Hopping. J Sport Biomech 2026; 12 (2) :210-222
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-475-en.html
1- Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Department of Sport Sciences, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.
2- Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Department of Sport Biomechanics, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (43 Views)
Objective The mechanical interaction between the human body and sports surfaces plays a critical role in maintaining functional stability and minimizing mechanical load. This study ergonomically examined sports surface stiffness within the typical indoor range (300–500 kN/m) and its influence on lower-limb mechanical behavior during a cyclic hopping task.
Methods Thirty male athletes with similar training backgrounds performed hopping across four stiffness conditions. Vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) data were collected using a force plate and analyzed via Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). Peak force, median frequency, and the 99.5% frequency components of the vGRF were compared across surfaces using repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc tests (α = 0.05).
Results Median frequency on the force plate was significantly higher than on all other surfaces (p < 0.001; large effect size η² = 0.437). The 99.5% frequency was greatest on the 500 kN/m surface (η² = 0.348), although the 300 kN/m surface did not differ from the force plate (p > 0.05). Conversely, peak vGRF was lowest on the 500 kN/m surface (p < 0.001; very large effect size η² = 0.654).
Conclusion The 300 kN/m surface produced more favorable force-frequency characteristics, whereas the 500 kN/m surface reduced mechanical loading. Overall, a stiffness range between 300 and 500 kN/m may provide an optimal balance between minimizing potentially injurious loading in both time and frequency domains. These findings offer practical guidance for the ergonomic design of sports flooring and training environments.
Full-Text [PDF 1778 kb]   (20 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/11/29 | Accepted: 2025/12/11 | Published: 2025/12/12

References
1. Stefanyshyn DJ, Nigg BM. Energy and performance aspects in sports surfaces. Sports Biomechanics. 2003;2(1):31-46.
2. McMahon TA, Greene PR. The influence of track compliance on running. Journal of Biomechanics. 1979;12(12):893-904. [DOI:10.1016/0021-9290(79)90057-5] [PMID]
3. Farley CT, Houdijk HH, Van Strien C, Louie M. Mechanism of leg stiffness adjustment for hopping on surfaces of different stiffnesses. Journal of Applied Physiology. 1998;85(3):1044-55. [DOI:10.1152/jappl.1998.85.3.1044] [PMID]
4. Kerdok AE, Biewener AA, McMahon TA, Weyand PG, Herr HM. Energetics and mechanics of human running on surfaces of different stiffnesses. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2002;92(2):469-78. [DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.01164.2000] [PMID]
5. Arampatzis A, Stafilidis S, Morey-Klapsing G, Brüggemann GP. Interaction of the human body and surfaces of different stiffness during drop jumps. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2004;36(3):451-9. [DOI:10.1249/01.MSS.0000117166.87736.0A] [PMID]
6. Birch JV, Kelly LA, Cresswell AG, Dixon SJ, Farris DJ. Neuromechanical adaptations of foot function to changes in surface stiffness during hopping. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2021;130(4):1196-204. [DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00401.2020] [PMID]
7. Moritz CT, Farley CT. Passive dynamics change leg mechanics for an unexpected surface during human hopping. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2004;97(4):1313-22. [DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00393.2004] [PMID]
8. Willwacher S, Fischer KM, Rohr E, Trudeau MB, Hamill J, Brüggemann GP. Surface stiffness and footwear affect the loading stimulus for lower extremity muscles when running. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2022;36(1):82-9. [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003410] [PMID]
9. Stafilidis S, Arampatzis A. Track compliance does not affect sprinting performance. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2007;25(13):1479-90. [DOI:10.1080/02640410601150462] [PMID]
10. Wróblewska Z, Kowalczyk P, Przednowek K. Leg stiffness and energy minimisation in human running gaits. Sports Engineering. 2024;27(2):1-10. [DOI:10.1007/s12283-024-00462-8]
11. Ismail SI, Nunome H, Lysdal FG, Kersting UG, Tamura Y. Futsal playing surface characteristics significantly affect perceived traction and change of direction performance among experienced futsal players. Journal of Sports Biomechanics. 2022;11(1):1-12. [DOI:10.1080/14763141.2022.2143415] [PMID]
12. Maquirriain J. The interaction between the tennis court and the player: How does surface affect leg stiffness? Sports Biomechanics. 2013;12(1):48-53. [DOI:10.1080/14763141.2012.725088] [PMID]
13. Farjad Pezeshk A, Sadeghi H, Shariatzadeh M, Ilbeigi S. Shifting joint regulation: The influence of hard spring surfaces on lower limb mechanics during hopping. Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. 2025;1(1):1-12. [DOI:10.1177/17543371251353664]
14. Piri E, Jafarnezhadgero A, Stålman A, Alihosseini S, Panahighaffarkandi Y. Comparison of the ground reaction force frequency spectrum during walking with and without anti-pronation insoles in individuals with pronated feet. Journal of Sports Biomechanics. 2025;11(1):20-33. [DOI:10.61186/JSportBiomech.11.1.20]
15. Wurdeman SR, Huisinga JM, Filipi M, Stergiou N. Multiple sclerosis affects the frequency content in the vertical ground reaction forces during walking. Clinical Biomechanics. 2011;26(2):207-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.09.021] [PMID]
16. Hobara H, Inoue K, Muraoka T, Omuro K, Sakamoto M, Kanosue K. Leg stiffness adjustment for a range of hopping frequencies in humans. Journal of Biomechanics. 2010;43(3):506-11. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.040]
17. Mohamadian MA, Sadeghi H, Khaleghi Tazji M. The relationship between lower extremity stiffness with selected biomechanical variables during vertical jumps in healthy active men. Journal of Sports Biomechanics. 2018;4(2):29-38.
18. Ashrostaghi M, Pezeshk AF, Sadeghi H, Shirzad E. Comparison of prediction ability between preferred, controlled, and maximal hopping. Series on Biomechanics. 2022;37(1):1-12. [DOI:10.7546/SB.36.2022.02.11]
19. Pezeshk AF, Yousefi M, Ilbeigi S, Shanbehzadeh S. The assessment of primary joint in 2.2 Hz hopping using factor analysis. Series on Biomechanics. 2023;37(2):1-12. [DOI:10.7546/SB.09.04.2023]
20. Farjad Pezeshk SA, Sadeghi H, Shariatzadeh M, Safaie Pour Z. Effect of surface stiffness on the risk factors related to ground reaction force during two-leg landing. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2020;9(2):318-25.
21. Farjad Pezeshk A, Sadeghi H, Safaeepour Z, Shariat Zadeh M. The effect of a custom area elastic surface with different stiffness on hopping performance and safety with an emphasis on familiarity to the surface. Journal of Advanced Sport Technology. 2017;1(1):5-14.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Sport Biomechanics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb