Volume 7, Issue 4 (2-2022)                   J Sport Biomech 2022, 7(4): 290-299 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khanjari Y. Comparing Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand Performance With Force Changes In a Two Hand Equilibrium Task: A Challenge to Dominant Hand Theories. J Sport Biomech 2022; 7 (4) :290-299
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-264-en.html
Comparing Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand Performance With Force Changes In a Two Hand Equilibrium Task: A Challenge to Dominant Hand Theories
Yaser Khanjari *
Department of Motor Learning, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
Keywords: Motor Program, Kinetics, Two Handed Coordination
Full-Text [PDF 1128 kb]   (751 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2394 Views)
Full-Text:   (931 Views)
Introduction

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines
All participants were informed of the full details of the research process and signed the consent form to participate in the research. Also, all the information of the subjects was kept completely confidential and they could cancel their participation in the research if they wished.

Funding



References
  1. Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol.Rev. 1975; 82(4):225-60. [DOI:10.1037/h0076770]
  2. Schmidt RA, Zelaznik H, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn Jr JT. Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev. 1979; 86(5):415-51.[DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.86.5.415]
  3. Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL. Information processing in movement organization and execution. In: Nickerson RS, editor. Attention and Performance. United Kingdom: Psychology Press; 1980. https://books.google.com/books/about/Attention_and_Performance_VIII.html?id=K5pa9DlnzFYC
  4. Turvey MT. Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. In: Shaw R, Bransford J, editors. Perceiving, acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. United States: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1977. https://books.google.com/books/about/Perceiving_Acting_and_Knowing.html?id=YGN9AAAAMAAJ
  5. Kugler PN, Kelso JS, Turvey MT. 1 On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures: I. Theoretical lines of convergence. Adv Psychol.  1980; 1:3-47. [DOI:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61936-6]
  6. Noguchi T, Demura S, Aoki H. Superiority of the dominant and nondominant hands in static strength and controlled force exertion. Percept Mot Skills. 2009; 109(2):339-46. [DOI:10.2466/pms.109.2.339-346] [PMID]
  7. Waterhouse C. The effect of extended practice on emg, kinematics and accuracy in dominant and non-dominant dart throwing. 2014. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Effect-of-Extended-Practice-on-EMG%2C-Kinematics-Waterhouse/0e71364194a262dee83c152d750a368cdec3b12e
  8. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Keller P. Muscle activity in throwing with the dominant and non-dominant arm. Cogent Med. 2019; 6(1):1678221. [DOI:10.1080/2331205X.2019.1678221]
  9. Armstrong CA, Oldham JA. A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand strengths. J Hand Surg Br. 1999; 24(4):421-5. [DOI:10.1054/JHSB.1999.0236] [PMID]
  10. Farthing JP. Chilibeck PD, Binsted G. Cross-education of arm muscular strength is unidirectional in right-handed individuals. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(9):1594-600.[DOI:10.1249/01.mss.0000177588.74448.75] [PMID]
  11. Noguchi T, Demura S, Nagasawa Y, Uchiyama M. An examination of practice and laterality effects on the Purdue Pegboard and Moving Beans with Tweezers. Percept Mot Skills. 2006; 102(1):265-74. [DOI:10.2466/pms.102.1.265-274] [PMID]
  12. Schmidt SL, Oliveira RM, Krahe TE, Filgueiras CC. The effects of hand preference and gender on finger tapping performance asymmetry by the use of an infra-red light measurement device. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38(5):529-34.[DOI:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00120-7]
  13. Özcan A, Tulum Z, Pınar L, Başkurt F. Comparison of pressure pain threshold, grip strength, dexterity and touch pressure of dominant and non-dominant hands within and between right-and left-handed subjects. J Korean Med Sci. 2004; 19(6):874-8. [DOI:10.3346/jkms.2004.19.6.874] [PMID] [PMCID]
  14. De Gennaro L, Cristiani R, Bertini M, Curcio G, Ferrara M, Fratello F, et al. Handedness is mainly associated with an asymmetry of corticospinal excitability and not of transcallosal inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115(6):1305-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.01.014] [PMID]
  15. Adam A, De Luca CJ, Erim Z. Hand dominance and motor unit firing behavior. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 80(3):1373-82.[DOI:10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1373] [PMID]
  16. Khanjari Y, Arabameri E, Shabazi M, Boroujeni ST, Bahrami F. Synergy patterns of brain activity during learning of the dart throwing skill with the dominant and non-dominant hand. S Afr J Res Sport Phys Educ Recreation. 2020; 42(2):49-66. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-sport-v42-n2-a4
  17. Wang J, Sainburg RL. The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performance. Exp Brain Res. 2007; 178(4):565-70. [DOI:10.1007/s00221-007-0936-x] [PMID]
  18. Bravi R, Cohen EJ, Martinelli A, Gottard A, Minciacchi D. When non-dominant is better than dominant: Kinesiotape modulates asymmetries in timed performance during a synchronization-continuation task. Front Integr Neurosci. 2017; 11:21. [DOI:10.3389/fnint.2017.00021] [PMID] [PMCID]
  19. Couillandre A, Ribeiro MJ, Thoumie P, Portero P. Changes in balance and strength parameters induced by training on a motorised rotating platform: A study on healthy subjects. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2008; 51(2):59-73. [DOI:10.1016/j.annrmp.2007.11.001] [PMID]
  20. Bohannon RW. Grip strength: A summary of studies comparing dominant and nondominant limb measurements. Percept Mot Skills. 2003; 96(3 Pt 1):728-30. [DOI:10.2466/pms.2003.96.3.728] [PMID]
  21. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971; 9(1):97-113.[DOI:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4]
  22. Touwen BC. Laterality and dominance. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1972; 14(6):747-55.[DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1972.tb03318.x] [PMID]
  23. Riek S, Tresilian JR, Mon-Williams M, Coppard VL, Carson RG. Bimanual aiming and overt attention: one law for two hands. Exp Brain Res. 2003; 153(1):59-75.[DOI:10.1007/s00221-003-1581-7] [PMID]
  24. Provins KA. The specificity of motor skill and manual asymmetry: A review of the evidence and its implications. J Mot Behav. 1997; 29(2):183-92. [DOI:10.1080/00222899709600832] [PMID]
  25. Wuyts IJ, Summers JJ, Carson RG, Byblow WD, Semjen A. Attention as a mediating variable in the dynamics of bimanual coordination. Hum Mov Sci. 1996; 15(6):877-97. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-9457(96)00033-4]
  26. Pellegrini AM, Andrade EC, Teixeira LA. Attending to the non-preferred hand improves bimanual coordination in children. Hum Mov Sci. 2004; 23(3-4):447-60. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2004.08.017] [PMID]

 
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/07/25 | Accepted: 2021/12/19 | Published: 2022/03/1
References
1. Schmidt, R.A., A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological review, 1975. 82(4): p. 225. [DOI:10.1037/h0076770]
2. Schmidt, R.A., et al., Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological review, 1979. 86(5): p. 415. [DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.86.5.415]
3. Marteniuk, R.G., &MacKenzie, C. L., Information processing in movement organization and execution. Attention and Performance, 1980(VIII): p. 29-57.
4. Turvey, M.T., Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. Perceiving, acting and knowing, 1977: p. 211-265.
5. Noguchi, T., S. Demura, and H. Aoki, Superiority of the dominant and nondominant hands in static strength and controlled force exertion. Perceptual and motor skills, 2009. 109(2): p. 339-346. [DOI:10.2466/pms.109.2.339-346] [PMID]
6. Waterhouse, C., The Effect of Extended Practice on EMG, Kinematics and Accuracy in Dominant and Non-dominant Dart Throwing. 2014.
7. Kuhtz-Buschbeck, J.P. and P. Keller, Muscle activity in throwing with the dominant and non-dominant arm. Cogent Medicine, 2019. 6(1): p. 1678221. [DOI:10.1080/2331205X.2019.1678221]
8. Khanjari, Y., et al., SYNERGY PATTERNS OF BRAIN ACTIVITY DURING LEARNING OF THE DART THROWING SKILL WITH THE DOMINANT AND NON-DOMINANT HAND. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education & Recreation, 2020. 42(2).
9. Wang, J. and R.L. Sainburg, The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performance. Experimental Brain Research, 2007. 178(4): p. 565-570. [DOI:10.1007/s00221-007-0936-x] [PMID]
10. Bravi, R., et al., When non-dominant is better than dominant: Kinesiotape modulates asymmetries in timed performance during a synchronization-continuation task. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2017. 11: p. 21. [DOI:10.3389/fnint.2017.00021] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Couillandre, A., et al. Changes in balance and strength parameters induced by training on a motorised rotating platform: A study on healthy subjects. in Annales de réadaptation et de médecine physique. 2008. Elsevier. [DOI:10.1016/j.annrmp.2007.11.001] [PMID]
12. Armstrong, C. and J.A. Oldham, A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand strengths. The Journal of Hand Surgery: British & European Volume, 1999. 24(4): p. 421-425. [DOI:10.1054/JHSB.1999.0236] [PMID]
13. Farthing, J.P., P.D. Chilibeck, and G. Binsted, Cross-education of arm muscular strength is unidirectional in right-handed individuals. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2005. 37(9): p. 1594-1600. [DOI:10.1249/01.mss.0000177588.74448.75] [PMID]
14. Noguchi, T., et al., An examination of practice and laterality effects on the purdue pegboard and moving beans with tweezers. Perceptual and motor skills, 2006. 102(1): p. 265-274. [DOI:10.2466/pms.102.1.265-274] [PMID]
15. Schmidt, S.L., et al., The effects of hand preference and gender on finger tapping performance asymmetry by the use of an infra-red light measurement device. Neuropsychologia, 2000. 38(5): p. 529-534. [DOI:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00120-7]
16. Bohannon, R.W., Grip strength: a summary of studies comparing dominant and nondominant limb measurements. Perceptual and motor skills, 2003. 96(3): p. 728-730. [DOI:10.2466/pms.2003.96.3.728] [PMID]
17. Oldfield, R.C., The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 1971. 9(1): p. 97-113. [DOI:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4]
18. Touwen, B.C., Laterality and dominance. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 1972. 14(6): p. 747-755. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1972.tb03318.x] [PMID]
19. Pellegrini, A., E. Andrade, and L. Teixeira, Attending to the non-preferred hand improves bimanual coordination in children. Human Movement Science, 2004. 23(3-4): p. 447-460. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2004.08.017] [PMID]
20. Kugler, P.N., J.S. Kelso, and M. Turvey, On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures: I. Theoretical lines of convergence. Tutorials in motor behavior, 1980. 3: p. 3-47. [DOI:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61936-6]
21. Ozcan, A., et al., Comparison of pressure pain threshold, grip strength, dexterity and touch pressure of dominant and non-dominant hands within and between right-and left-handed subjects. Journal of Korean medical science, 2004. 19(6): p. 874-878. [DOI:10.3346/jkms.2004.19.6.874] [PMID] [PMCID]
22. De Gennaro, L., et al., Handedness is mainly associated with an asymmetry of corticospinal excitability and not of transcallosal inhibition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2004. 115(6): p. 1305-1312. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.01.014] [PMID]
23. Adam, A., C.J.D. Luca, and Z. Erim, Hand dominance and motor unit firing behavior. Journal of neurophysiology, 1998. 80(3): p. 1373-1382. [DOI:10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1373] [PMID]
24. Riek, S., et al., Bimanual aiming and overt attention: one law for two hands. Experimental brain research, 2003. 153(1): p. 59-75. [DOI:10.1007/s00221-003-1581-7] [PMID]
25. Provins, K., The specificity of motor skill and manual asymmetry: A review of the evidence and its implications. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1997. 29(2): p. 183-192. [DOI:10.1080/00222899709600832] [PMID]
26. Wuyts, I.J., et al., Attention as a mediating variable in the dynamics of bimanual coordination. Human Movement Science, 1996. 15(6): p. 877-897. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-9457(96)00033-4]
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Sport Biomechanics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb