Volume 10, Issue 1 (5-2024)                   J Sport Biomech 2024, 10(1): 70-81 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Yousefian Molla R, Sadeghi H. Comparison of the Three-Dimensional Mechanical Power of Dominant Lower Limb Joints during Walking. J Sport Biomech 2024; 10 (1) :70-81
URL: http://biomechanics.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-338-en.html
1- Department of Sports Biomechanics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Sports Biomechanics and Injuries, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (138 Views)
Objective Many studies have investigated the effect of mechanical power on the symmetry and asymmetry of the lower limbs and have discussed the differences in the values of this parameter between the two limbs. Additionally, some studies have investigated and analyzed the types of mechanical power (propulsion and control) in joint movements. However, no study has yet examined and compared the muscle mechanical power among different joints of each limb, particularly the dominant leg. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the three-dimensional mechanical power of the dominant lower limb during walking.
Methods Thirty female subjects were asked to walk at their chosen speed and barefoot along the path of the motion analyzer cameras and on the force plate so that the three-dimensional mechanical power of each lower limb joint could be recorded using the obtained data. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni's post hoc test were used to compare the values of mechanical muscle power variables at a significance level of P≤0.05.
Results Among the peaks of mechanical power of the dominant lower limb, the highest peak belonged to A2S, and the lowest belonged to K2T. Additionally, the most significant difference was observed between the average of some parameters such as H1S and other peaks, while the lowest average difference was observed between the averages of H2F and H1T and other mechanical power peaks.
Conclusion Therefore, it can be concluded that there is a relationship between the peaks of mechanical power of the hip, knee, and ankle joints of the dominant lower limb. Among these peaks, the second peak of the ankle has the highest mechanical power, while the second peak of the knee has the lowest mechanical power.
Full-Text [PDF 1912 kb]   (110 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (45 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/06/11 | Accepted: 2024/06/20 | Published: 2024/06/21

References
1. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Duhaime M. Functional gait asymmetry in able-bodied subjects. Human movement science. 1997;16(2-3):243-58. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-9457(96)00054-1]
2. Valtonen AM, Pöyhönen T, Manninen M, Heinonen A, Sipilä S. Knee extensor and flexor muscle power explains stair ascension time in patients with unilateral late-stage knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2015;96(2):253-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.011] [PMID]
3. Sadeghi H, Prince F, Zabjek KF, Allard P. Sagittal-hip-muscle power during walking in old and young able-bodied men. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 2001;9(2):172-83. [DOI:10.1123/japa.9.2.172]
4. Molla RY. The Effect of Dominant and Non-dominant Upper Limb Splinting on 3-D Mechanical Muscle Power of Ankle Joint During Walking. Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health Studies. 2024(In Press).
5. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement: John Wiley & Sons; 2009. [DOI:10.1002/9780470549148]
6. Sadeghi H, Sadeghi S, Allard P, Labelle H, Duhaime M. Lower limb muscle power relationships in bilateral able-bodied gait. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. 2001;80(11):821-30. [DOI:10.1097/00002060-200111000-00006] [PMID]
7. Yousefian Molla R, Sadeghi H. Effect of Changes of Upper Extremity Pattern Movements on Biomechanical Variables of Gait: A Systematic Review. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2020;9(2):298-310.
8. Teixeira-Salmela LF, Nadeau S, Milot M-H, Gravel D, Requião LF. Effects of cadence on energy generation and absorption at lower extremity joints during gait. Clinical biomechanics. 2008;23(6):769-78. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.02.007] [PMID]
9. Winter D. A review of kinematic parameters in human walking. Gait analysis: theory and application. 1995.
10. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Duhaime M. Contributions of lower-limb muscle power in gait of people without impairments. Physical Therapy. 2000;80(12):1188-96. [DOI:10.1093/ptj/80.12.1188] [PMID]
11. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Prince F, Labelle H. Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review. Gait & posture. 2000;12(1):34-45. [DOI:10.1016/S0966-6362(00)00070-9] [PMID]
12. Hannah R, Morrison J, Chapman A. Kinematic symmetry of the lower limbs. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1984;65(4):155-8.
13. Yousefian Molla R, Sadeghi H, Kiani A. Symmetry or Asymmetry of Lower Limb 3D-Mechanical Muscle Power in Female Athletes' Gait. Journal of Advanced Sport Technology. 2023;7(2):12-22.
14. Bogey RA, Barnes LA. Estimates of individual muscle power production in normal adult walking. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2017;14(1):1-10. [DOI:10.1186/s12984-017-0306-2] [PMID]
15. Fukuda Y, Masani K, Yamaguchi T. Comparison of lower limb joint moment and power during turning gait between young and old adults using hierarchical Bayesian inference. Journal of Biomechanics. 2020;103:109702. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109702] [PMID]
16. Kostka J, Niwald M, Guligowska A, Kostka T, Miller E. Muscle power, contraction velocity and functional performance after stroke. Brain and behavior. 2019;9(4):e01243. [DOI:10.1002/brb3.1243] [PMID]
17. Robertson DGE, Caldwell GE, Hamill J, Kamen G, Whittlesey S. Research methods in biomechanics: Human kinetics; 2013. [DOI:10.5040/9781492595809]
18. Zelik KE, Honert EC. Ankle and foot power in gait analysis: Implications for science, technology and clinical assessment. Journal of Biomechanics. 2018;75:1-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.017] [PMID]
19. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Lachance R, Aissaoui R, Sadeghi S, Perrault R, et al. Relationship between ankle frontal muscle powers and three-D gait patterns. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. 2002;81(6):429-36. [DOI:10.1097/00002060-200206000-00007] [PMID]
20. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Duhaime M. Muscle power compensatory mechanisms in below-knee amputee gait. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. 2001;80(1):25-32. [DOI:10.1097/00002060-200101000-00007] [PMID]
21. Saez de Asteasu ML, Martínez‐Velilla N, Zambom‐Ferraresi F, Ramírez‐Vélez R, García‐Hermoso A, Cadore EL, et al. Changes in muscle power after usual care or early structured exercise intervention in acutely hospitalized older adults. Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle. 2020;11(4):997-1006. [DOI:10.1002/jcsm.12564] [PMID]
22. Plotnik M, Wagner JM, Adusumilli G, Gottlieb A, Naismith RT. Gait asymmetry, and bilateral coordination of gait during a six-minute walk test in persons with multiple sclerosis. Scientific reports. 2020;10(1):1-11. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-68263-0] [PMID]
23. Saunders DR. Components of biological motion perception: Queen's University; 2011.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Sport Biomechanics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb